Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 522.010 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following definitions apply in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Public servant" means: (a) Any public officer or employee of the state or of any political subdivision thereof or of any governmental instrumentality within the state; or (b) Any person exercising the functions of any such public officer or employee; or (c) Any person participating as advisor, consultant or otherwise in performing a governmental function, but not including witnesses; or (d) Any person elected, appointed or designated to become a public servant although not yet occupying that position. (2) "Benefit" means gain or advantage to the beneficiary or to a third person pursuant to the desire or consent of the beneficiary. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 186, effective January 1, 1975.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: Commonwealth Revenue Cabinet v. Cope, 875 S.W.2d 87 (Ky. 1994).
Commonwealth Revenue Cabinet v. Cope, 875 S.W.2d 87 (Ky. 1994). “140); and they are subject to civil and criminal sanctions not applicable to persons employed in private enterprise (KRS 522.010 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ). In recognition of the foregoing somewhat negative features of governmental employment, the General Assembly has endeavored to…”
Clark v. Franklin Cnty., Kentucky (E.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 2× “070 does provide a civil remedy for conduct in violation of KRS § 522.010, et seq. But even if such a civil remedy does exist, the complaint is insufficient to state a claim for relief for official misconduct.”
David v. Franklin Cnty., Kentucky (E.D. Ky. 2024). · cites it 2× “] However, KRS § 522.010 et seq. contemplates criminal penalties against people, not against a county.”
Kamineni (E.D. Ky. 2026). “Kamineni alleges that the Individual Defendants have engaged in “an abuse of office” in violation of KRS 522.010, et seq., which is a state statute that prohibits such conduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.