Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 93.370 (2026)

Repealed, 1980

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Improvement of streets and alleys -- Hearing -- Curbing included -- Apportionment of cost -- Square defined -- Ordinance as to city bearing cost. History: Repealed 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 239, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 223, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2833.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1946–1958 · leading case: Brooks v. Meyers, 279 S.W.2d 764 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
Brooks v. Meyers, 279 S.W.2d 764 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 5× “The basic contention of the appellants, and others similarly situated, is that the ordinance and assessments are void,- because, they say, the City of Louisville had no authority to make the improvement pursuant to KRS 93.370, known as the “Regular Plan,” but should have…”
Krumpelman v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Metro. Sewer Dist., 314 S.W.2d 557 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). · cites it 6× “172 of the Act was also amended in 1952 so as to authorize the sewer district to construct such branch or lateral sewers at the exclusive cost of the owners of land as set forth in KRS 93.370 with reference to the improvement of streets or alleys.”
City of Louisville v. Helman, 253 S.W.2d 598 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “The city has appealed, and the only question raised is whether the judgment is erroneous by reason of KRS 93.370, which provides that street improvements “shall be made at the exclusive cost of the owners” of abutting property.”
Breslin v. Gray, 193 S.W.2d 143 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). “” Section 2833, Kentucky Statutes, now KRS 93.370. The ordinance in this case provided that the work should be done “at the cost of the ground on the north side of Frankfort Avenue * * * extending back half way to Arterburn Avenue and on the south side * * * extending back to a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.