La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143 (2026)

Repealed by Acts 2014, No. 328, §5, eff. Jan. 1, 2015.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§143.  Repealed by Acts 2014, No. 328, §5, eff. Jan. 1, 2015.

Acts 1968, No. 105, §1.  Amended by Acts 1970, No. 50, §13, emerg. eff. June 18, 1970, at 5:05 P.M.; Acts 1976, No. 587, §1, eff. Aug. 4, 1976; Acts 1982, No. 871, §1; Acts 1984, No. 406, §1; Acts 1985, No. 269, §1, eff. July 6, 1985; Acts 2014, No. 328, §5, eff. Jan. 1, 2015.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases, 1974–2020 · leading case: Judson v. Davis, 916 So. 2d 1106 (La. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Judson v. Davis, 916 So. 2d 1106 (La. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 14× “Judson contends that the reconventional demand was filed without leave of court, contrary to La.”
Bihm v. Deca Sys., Inc., 226 So. 3d 466 (La. Ct. App. 2017). “R.S. 12:143. {repealed by 2014 La. Acts, No.”
Matherne v. Response Instrument Serv. & Eng'g Corp., 533 So. 2d 1011 (La. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “R.S. 12:143 A(2) & (7), which provide as follows: A.”
In re Discontinuance & Disposition of P.K. Smith Motors, Inc., 188 So. 3d 324 (La. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 12× “R.S. 12:143(0). Noting Bradley’s lack of experience in running a car dealership and the harmful effects of liquidation on P.”
Bunn v. OL Bunn, Inc., 341 So. 2d 629 (La. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 4× “LSA-R.S. 12:143(A) [4] sets forth nine *632 grounds for involuntary dissolution.”
Clement v. McNabb, 580 So. 2d 981 (La. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “R.S. 12:143 E and La.R.S. 12:151 A; Bunn v.”
River Cities Const. Co. v. Barnard & Burk, Inc., 413 So. 2d 666 (La. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “However, R.S. 12:143(A)(8) provides that a court may entertain a proceeding for involuntary dissolution of a corporation when it appears that the corporation's franchise has been annulled, vacated or forfeited under the provisions of R.”
Tessier v. Moffatt, 93 F. Supp. 2d 729 (E.D. La. 1998). · cites it 2× “Section 12:143(E) provides that “[t]he court may, after trial, appoint a judicial liquidator, and may, ex parte pending trial, appoint a temporary liquidator whose authority shall cease upon appointment of a judicial liquidator, upon dismissal of the petition, or upon…”
Baltazor v. Walden, 459 So. 2d 711 (La. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “R.S. 12:143 E. The language of La.R.S. 12:163 does more than authorize reinstatement within one year of revocation.”
Palowsky v. Cork, 162 So. 3d 486 (La. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “R.S. 12:143 A(4). The dissolution procedure requires the court to appoint a liquidator, La.”
Olson v. Olson, 139 So. 3d 539 (La. Ct. App. 2014). “LSA-R.S. 12:143(B)(1). At trial, the plaintiff asserted claims for recognition of shareholder loans that she made to KM, Inc.”
Kaufman & Enzer Jt. v. v. BETHLAN PROD. CORP., 459 So. 2d 60 (La. Ct. App. 1984). “a"; or (4) By any creditor, that property of the corporation has been seized under judicial process by fraud or collusion between the corporation, its directors, officers or shareholders, and any creditor; or (5) By any shareholder, that a majority of the shareholders are…”
Show all 30 citing cases →
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(0): 1 case
In re Discontinuance & Disposition of P.K. Smith Motors, Inc., 188 So. 3d 324 (La. Ct. App. 2016). “R.S. 12:143(0). Noting Bradley’s lack of experience in running a car dealership and the harmful effects of liquidation on P.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(A): 3 cases
Judson v. Davis, 916 So. 2d 1106 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “Judson contends that the reconventional demand was filed without leave of court, contrary to La.”
Bunn v. OL Bunn, Inc., 341 So. 2d 629 (La. Ct. App. 1977). “LSA-R.S. 12:143(A) [4] sets forth nine *632 grounds for involuntary dissolution.”
Gruenberg v. Goldmine Plantation, Inc., 304 So. 2d 873 (La. Ct. App. 1974).
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(A)(2): 1 case
Gruenberg v. Goldmine Plantation, Inc., 360 So. 2d 884 (La. Ct. App. 1978).
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(A)(4): 3 cases
Judson v. Davis, 916 So. 2d 1106 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “Judson contends that the reconventional demand was filed without leave of court, contrary to La.”
Kaufman & Enzer Jt. v. v. BETHLAN PROD. CORP., 459 So. 2d 60 (La. Ct. App. 1984). “a"; or (4) By any creditor, that property of the corporation has been seized under judicial process by fraud or collusion between the corporation, its directors, officers or shareholders, and any creditor; or (5) By any shareholder, that a majority of the shareholders are…”
Ernst Cafe, Inc. v. Landry, 966 So. 2d 1080 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(A)(8): 1 case
River Cities Const. Co. v. Barnard & Burk, Inc., 413 So. 2d 666 (La. Ct. App. 1982). “However, R.S. 12:143(A)(8) provides that a court may entertain a proceeding for involuntary dissolution of a corporation when it appears that the corporation's franchise has been annulled, vacated or forfeited under the provisions of R.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(B): 2 cases
Carmouche Law Firm, APLC v. Pias, 880 So. 2d 49 (La. Ct. App. 2004).
Gruenberg v. Goldmine Plantation, Inc., 304 So. 2d 873 (La. Ct. App. 1974).
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(B)(1): 2 cases
Olson v. Olson, 139 So. 3d 539 (La. Ct. App. 2014). “LSA-R.S. 12:143(B)(1). At trial, the plaintiff asserted claims for recognition of shareholder loans that she made to KM, Inc.”
Freeman v. Med. Sys., Inc, 15 So. 3d 385 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(C): 2 cases
Judson v. Davis, 916 So. 2d 1106 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “Judson contends that the reconventional demand was filed without leave of court, contrary to La.”
In re Discontinuance & Disposition of P.K. Smith Motors, Inc., 188 So. 3d 324 (La. Ct. App. 2016). “R.S. 12:143(0). Noting Bradley’s lack of experience in running a car dealership and the harmful effects of liquidation on P.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 12:143(E): 3 cases
Judson v. Davis, 916 So. 2d 1106 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “Judson contends that the reconventional demand was filed without leave of court, contrary to La.”
Tessier v. Moffatt, 93 F. Supp. 2d 729 (E.D. La. 1998). “Section 12:143(E) provides that “[t]he court may, after trial, appoint a judicial liquidator, and may, ex parte pending trial, appoint a temporary liquidator whose authority shall cease upon appointment of a judicial liquidator, upon dismissal of the petition, or upon…”
Bunn v. OL Bunn, Inc., 341 So. 2d 629 (La. Ct. App. 1977). “LSA-R.S. 12:143(A) [4] sets forth nine *632 grounds for involuntary dissolution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.