La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471 (2026)

Supplementary rules of service of process

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CHAPTER 14.  PROCESS

§3471.  Supplementary rules of service of process

The following rules supplement those governing the service of citation and other legal process in a civil action or proceeding contained in the Code of Civil Procedure:

(1)(a)  If the foreign corporation or the foreign limited liability company is not one required by law to appoint an agent for the service of process, but has engaged in a business activity in this state, service of process in an action or proceeding on a cause of action resulting from such business activity in this state, or for any taxes due or other obligations arising therefrom, may be made on any employee or agent of the corporation or limited liability company of suitable age and discretion found in the state.

(b)  If such employees or agents are no longer in the state, or cannot be found after diligent effort, the officer charged with the duty of making the service shall make his return to the court, stating the efforts made by him to secure service and the reason why he was unable to do so.  Thereupon the court shall order that service shall be made on the secretary of state, or on some other individual in his office whom the secretary of state may designate to receive service of process.

(c)  The secretary of state shall ascertain the domiciliary post office address of the corporation, or limited liability company and shall send the original papers served to the corporation or limited liability company by registered or certified mail, or by commercial courier as defined in R.S. 13:3204(D), when the corporation or person to be served is located outside of this state.  The secretary of state shall retain in his office true copies of these papers, on which he shall note the date, the manner and other particulars of the service, and of the disposition made of the original papers.

(2)  In an action or proceeding brought in a parish other than that of the domicile of a defendant, citation and all other legal process may be served on this defendant in the parish where the action or proceeding was brought, if the defendant can be served therein.  Otherwise, the process may be sent by the clerk of the court from which it issued to any parish where the defendant may be found, and service may be made by the sheriff or a constable of the latter parish.

(3)  When an action or proceeding is brought in the parish of the domicile of a defendant, and the latter is absent therefrom, service may be made on him in any parish of the state where he may be found.

(4)  An acceptance of service shall be dated, and if no date is shown thereon, the acceptance takes effect from the date of its filing in court.  No acceptance of service shall affect the delays allowed by law or by the local rules of court.

(5)  The return of the serving officer on any citation or other legal process is conclusive, unless directly attacked.  Such an attack may be made by rule in the action or proceeding, if made prior to judgment.  If made after judgment, the return may be attacked only in a direct action to annul the judgment, which may be brought in the original action or proceeding.

If the defendant was actually served, the court may correct an error in the return by an amendment thereof, on a rule brought against and tried contradictorily with the defendant who was served, or any other party who may be affected by the amendment.

(6)  Service of process on an inmate of a public institution may be made by the sheriff or any constable of the parish where the institution is situated.

(7)  Service of process by a sheriff or constable shall be returned into the court which issued the process as soon as possible after the service is made.  In addition thereto, the serving officer shall keep a complete record thereof in a book specially provided for that purpose.  If the original return is lost or destroyed, the entries in this book shall be received and recognized in lieu thereof, subject to the provisions of R.S. 13:3471(5).

(8)  Subsequent to service of the original petition in any civil action or proceeding, service of pleadings, documents, or notices that may be served by mail or delivery on an attorney of record may also be made by transmitting a copy to the attorney by electronic means at the number or addresses for receipt of electronic service expressly designated in a pleading or other writing for receipt of electronic service.  Service by electronic means is complete upon transmission but is not effective and shall not be certified if the serving party learns  the transmission did not reach the attorney to be served.

Amended by Acts 1950, No. 21, §1; Acts 1954, No. 142, §1; Acts 1960, No. 32, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 1961; Acts 1983, No. 125, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984; Acts 1987, No. 671, §1; Acts 1989, No. 524, §1; Acts 1999, No. 145, §3; Acts 1999, No. 395, §2; Acts 2010, No. 185, §2; Acts 2012, No. 544, §2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 109 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: Babineaux v. Se. Drilling Corp., 170 So. 2d 518 (La. Ct. App. 1965).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Babineaux v. Se. Drilling Corp., 170 So. 2d 518 (La. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 7× “(Law Institute Explanatory Note to LSA-R.S. 13:3471, as amended by Act 32 of 1960.”
Home Gas & Fuel Co. v. Mississippi Tank Co., 143 So. 2d 641 (La. Ct. App. 1962). · cites it 6× “, has not appointed an agent for service of process in the State of Louisiana, and since plaintiff strongly contends that defendant transacted business in this state, the question of whether or not the court has jurisdiction thus becomes a question of whether or not the…”
Robinson v. Vanguard Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 1360 (La. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 3× “R.S. 13:3471 which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: The following rules supplement those governing the service of citation and other legal process in a civil action or proceeding contained in the Code of Civil Procedure: (1) If the foreign corporation is not one required…”
Roper v. Dailey, 393 So. 2d 85 (La. 1981). · cites it 2× “R.S. 13:3471(5). This action of nullity followed on August 16, 1978, in which Roper alleged that he was not properly served with process as required by law, and that the default judgment was based on insufficient evidence.”
Stelly v. Quick Mfg., Inc., 228 So. 2d 548 (La. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 4× “The trial judge held that plaintiff had failed to comply with the provisions of LSA-R.S. 13:3471, and that the exception to service of process and citation filed by Quick should be maintained.”
Arkansas Oak Flooring Co. v. United Mine Workers of Am., 81 So. 2d 413 (La. 1955). · cites it 5× “[3] Section 9(f) and (g) require that a Union seeking to be declared the bargaining agent of employees file with the Secretary of Labor certain information relative to its organizational and financial structure, and Section 9(h) requires the filing of affidavits with the…”
Hood Motor Co., Inc. v. Lawrence, 334 So. 2d 460 (La. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “[2] However, we feel that these articles should also be considered along with R.S. 13:3471 (5), which reads: (5) The return of the serving officer on any citation or other legal process is conclusive, unless directly attacked.”
Blue, Williams & Buckley v. Brian Investments, Ltd., 706 So. 2d 999 (La. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “R.S. 13:3471(6), which provides that service of process on an inmate of a public institution may be made by the sheriff of the parish where the institution is located.”
Swann v. Performance Contractors, Ltd., 271 So. 2d 294 (La. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 7× “LSA-R.S. 13:3471 is the statute upon which plaintiff relied for service of process.”
Buckley v. Beaumont Enter., 232 F. Supp. 986 (E.D. La. 1964). · cites it 7× “Service of the complaint was-made through the Louisiana Secretary *987 ■of State pursuant to LSA-R.S. 13:3471 (l). 1 Defendant now moves to quash .”
Clay v. Clay, 389 So. 2d 31 (La. 1980). “And too, R.S. 13:3471 directs the court to order the officer attempting to serve a foreign corporation with no agents or employees within the state to serve the secretary of state (or one of his employees) as agent for the foreign corporation.”
Thompson v. Great Midwest Fur Co., 395 So. 2d 840 (La. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “R.S. 13:3471 deals with supplementary rules of service of process.”
Show all 109 citing cases →
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(1): 40 cases
Babineaux v. Se. Drilling Corp., 170 So. 2d 518 (La. Ct. App. 1965). “(Law Institute Explanatory Note to LSA-R.S. 13:3471, as amended by Act 32 of 1960.”
Robinson v. Vanguard Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 1360 (La. Ct. App. 1985). “R.S. 13:3471 which provides, in pertinent part, as follows: The following rules supplement those governing the service of citation and other legal process in a civil action or proceeding contained in the Code of Civil Procedure: (1) If the foreign corporation is not one required…”
Adcock v. Sur. Rsch. & Inv. Corp., 344 So. 2d 969 (La. 1977).
Riverland Hardwood Co., Inc. v. Craftsman Hard. Lbr. Co., 251 So. 2d 45 (La. 1971).
Belser v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., 509 So. 2d 12 (La. Ct. App. 1987).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(1)(1991): 1 case
Head & Engquist Equip., L.L.C. v. Penelore Corp., 864 So. 2d 1025 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(1)(a): 1 case
Ganpat v. E. Pac. Shipping PTE. Ltd. (E.D. La. 2020).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(11): 2 cases
Town of Eunice v. M & L Constr. Co., 123 So. 2d 579 (La. Ct. App. 1960).
Purcell v. Stewart, 131 So. 2d 905 (La. Ct. App. 1961).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(15): 2 cases
Wadsworth v. Alexius, 99 So. 2d 77 (La. 1958).
Martinez v. Hunt, 92 So. 2d 784 (La. Ct. App. 1957).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(2): 1 case
Franz v. Ledoux, 927 So. 2d 534 (La. Ct. App. 2006).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(22): 3 cases
Arkansas Oak Flooring Co. v. United Mine Workers of Am., 81 So. 2d 413 (La. 1955). “[3] Section 9(f) and (g) require that a Union seeking to be declared the bargaining agent of employees file with the Secretary of Labor certain information relative to its organizational and financial structure, and Section 9(h) requires the filing of affidavits with the…”
Teamsters Local Union No. 5 v. Tasty Baking Co., 124 So. 2d 355 (La. Ct. App. 1960).
State ex rel. Doane v. Gen. Longshore Workers, I. L. A. Local Union 1418, 61 So. 2d 747 (La. Ct. App. 1952).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(5): 27 cases
Roper v. Dailey, 393 So. 2d 85 (La. 1981). “R.S. 13:3471(5). This action of nullity followed on August 16, 1978, in which Roper alleged that he was not properly served with process as required by law, and that the default judgment was based on insufficient evidence.”
Hood Motor Co., Inc. v. Lawrence, 334 So. 2d 460 (La. Ct. App. 1976). “[2] However, we feel that these articles should also be considered along with R.S. 13:3471 (5), which reads: (5) The return of the serving officer on any citation or other legal process is conclusive, unless directly attacked.”
Francis v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Emp. Hosp. Ass'n, 148 So. 2d 118 (La. Ct. App. 1962).
Arsenault v. Gulf States Utils. Co., 482 So. 2d 695 (La. Ct. App. 1985).
Tucker v. Howes, 413 So. 2d 585 (La. Ct. App. 1982).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(5)(d): 1 case
Babineaux v. Se. Drilling Corp., 170 So. 2d 518 (La. Ct. App. 1965). “(Law Institute Explanatory Note to LSA-R.S. 13:3471, as amended by Act 32 of 1960.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(6): 3 cases
Blue, Williams & Buckley v. Brian Investments, Ltd., 706 So. 2d 999 (La. Ct. App. 1997). “R.S. 13:3471(6), which provides that service of process on an inmate of a public institution may be made by the sheriff of the parish where the institution is located.”
Bush v. Orleans Par. Sch. Bd., 187 F. Supp. 42 (E.D. La. 1960).
Go Green Disposal & Recycling, LLC & Anwar Gaber v. Mabb Prods., LLC (La. Ct. App. 2026).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(7): 1 case
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Guidry, 177 So. 2d 184 (La. Ct. App. 1965).
La. Rev. Stat. § 13:3471(8): 3 cases
Texaco, Inc. v. Finegan, 119 So. 2d 646 (La. Ct. App. 1960).
Sears v. Callaway, 139 So. 2d 86 (La. Ct. App. 1962).
Cycle Sport, LLC v. Jones, 962 So. 2d 1235 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.