La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 37:381 (2026)

Powers of the board; rules and regulations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§381.  Powers of the board; rules and regulations

The board shall act as a control board for the purpose of administering this Chapter.  It shall have any powers necessary for the purpose of administering and enforcing this Chapter.  Generally the board shall have the authority to do the following:

(1)  Make reasonable rules and regulations for the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter.  

(2)  Prescribe sanitary requirements for barber shops and schools subject to the approval of the state health officer.  A copy of these sanitary requirements shall be furnished by the board to the owner or manager of each barber shop or barber school and shall be posted in a conspicuous place therein.  

(3)  Supervise, investigate, and regulate the barbering industry of the state.  

(4)  Subpoena barbers and other persons from whom information may be desired to carry out the purpose and intent of this Chapter, administer oaths, and issue commissions to take depositions of witnesses absent from the state.  Any member of the board or any designated employee may sign and issue subpoenas and may administer oaths to witnesses.  

(5)  Act as mediator or arbitrator in any controversy or issue that may arise between or among barbers as individuals or as groups.  

Acts 1964, No. 309, §1.  Acts 1984, No. 238, §1.  

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Russell v. TMT Transp. Corp., 852 So. 2d 1196 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Russell v. TMT Transp. Corp., 852 So. 2d 1196 (La. Ct. App. 2003). “R.S. 37:381(5). Thus, there is significant question whether, in the absence of the LAL or other statutory enumeration in favor of arbitration, the parties’ freedom of contract allows an arbi-tral provision for the nonjudicial | (¡resolution of future disputes arising from their…”
La. Rev. Stat. § 37:381(5): 1 case
Russell v. TMT Transp. Corp., 852 So. 2d 1196 (La. Ct. App. 2003). “R.S. 37:381(5). Thus, there is significant question whether, in the absence of the LAL or other statutory enumeration in favor of arbitration, the parties’ freedom of contract allows an arbi-tral provision for the nonjudicial | (¡resolution of future disputes arising from their…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.