La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 46:437.1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART VI-A.  MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

PROGRAMS INTEGRITY LAW

SUBPART A.  GENERAL PROVISIONS

§437.1.  Short title

This Part may be cited as the "Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law".

Acts 1997, No. 1373, §1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: State v. Astra Zeneca AB, 249 So. 3d 38 (La. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Astra Zeneca AB, 249 So. 3d 38 (La. Ct. App. 2018). “" The State raised claims under LUTPA and the Louisiana Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law (MAPIL), LSA-R.S. 46:437.1, et seq. , along with claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, redhibition, and unjust enrichment.”
United States Ex Rel. Nowak v. Medtronic, Inc., 806 F. Supp. 2d 310 (D. Mass. 2011). “5—2(b)( 1) and (8); Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law, La.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 46:437.1 et seq.; Mass.”
State v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 208 So. 3d 384 (La. Ct. App. 2016). “R.S. 46:437.1, et seq., as well as claims for fraud, negli *387 gent misrepresentation, redhibition, and unjust enrichment.”
Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc. v. Bynum, 879 So. 2d 807 (La. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, pursuant to LSA-R.S. 46:437.1, et seq., the Medical Assistance Programs Integrity Law, the State sought an order of forfeiture of the home from Oubre, in that it was derived from illegally obtained Medicaid funds.”
United States Ex Rel. Bogart v. King Pharm., 414 F. Supp. 2d 540 (E.D. Pa. 2006). “R.S. 46:437.1 et seq.). Count XII thereof was filed by the Relator on behalf the State of Hawaii and asserted claims under Haw.”
Manuel (W.D. La. 2026). · cites it 3× “§ 1347 (9) Count IX – Violations of Louisiana Medical Assistance Programs Integrity LAW (“LMAPIL”) Louisiana Revised Statute § § 46:437.1 (10) Count X – Violations of the Federal Whistleblower Statute 42 U.”
State v. Molina Healthcare, Inc Molina Info. Sys., L.L.C. D/B/A Molina Medicaid Solutions Paramax Sys. Corp. & Unisys Corp. (La. 2019). “R.S. 46:437.1, et seq.); however, these statutory theories of recovery were earlier dismissed on Unisys’ exceptions of no cause of action.”
Caldwell ex rel. State v. Janssen Pharm., Inc., 100 So. 3d 865 (2012). “R.S. 46:437.1 through 46:440.3, 1 and represented by private attorneys, can successfully recover civil penalties from a pharmaceutical company without proving damages.”
Caldwell ex rel. Louisiana v. Bristol Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharm. Holding P'ship, 116 F. Supp. 3d 727 (2015). “R.S. 46:437.1 • et seq. and the Unfair Trade- Practices and Consumer Protection Law (“LUTPCPL”), La.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.