La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 56:423 (2026)

Property rights; larceny or other public offense concerning; leases heritable and transferable; adjudication of claims

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§423. Property rights; larceny or other public offense concerning; leases heritable and transferable; adjudication of claims

            A. A lessee shall enjoy the exclusive use of the water bottoms leased and of all oysters and cultch grown or placed thereon, subject to the restrictions and regulations of this Subpart and Part II of Chapter 2 of Title 49 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950.

            (1) This exclusive use of water bottoms is subordinate to the rights or responsibilities of the state, any political subdivision of the state, the United States, or any agency or agent thereof, to take any action in furtherance of integrated coastal protection as defined in R.S. 49:214.2.

            (2) This exclusive use of water bottoms for any oyster lease initially applied for after July 1, 2016, or any renewal or judicial partition of such lease is also subordinate to the rights of any person:

            (a) To engage in any activity authorized by a coastal use permit, determination, or coastal use authorization pursuant to R.S. 49:214.30 or a drilling permit, for which the coastal use authorization or drilling permit application was issued prior to the date the application for the oyster lease was issued. This Subparagraph applies only in the following areas:

            (i) The area from the centerline of the pipeline or area from the outside of the well, platform, shell pad, or facility as designated by the coastal use permit, determination, or other coastal use authorization pursuant to R.S. 49:214.30 or drilling permit, or

            (ii) If no such area delineated in Item (i) of this Subparagraph is designated, then this Item applies in the following areas:

            (aa) For a pipeline, within seventy-five feet from the centerline of the pipe.

            (bb) For a well, platform, shell pad, or facility, within two hundred fifty feet from the outside of the well, platform, shell pad, or facility.

            (b) To operate, maintain, repair, replace, rehabilitate, or remove any pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility on or impacting an oyster lease in which the pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility was placed or constructed before September 20, 1980, or was placed or constructed prior to the date the oyster lease was issued. This Subparagraph applies only in the following areas:

            (i) For a pipeline, within seventy-five feet from the centerline of the pipe.

            (ii) For a well, platform, shell pad, or facility, within two hundred fifty feet from the outside of the well, platform, shell pad, or facility.

            (c) To cross an oyster lease to access any activity, pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility to which Subparagraph (2)(a) or (2)(b) of this Subsection applies. This Subparagraph applies only to a single access channel across each oyster lease per activity, pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility, determined as follows:

            (i) For any activity, pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility, including the removal of any pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility, to which Subparagraph (2)(a) of this Subsection applies, if an access channel across each oyster lease is identified in the coastal use authorization or permit, it shall be the sole access channel for purposes of this Subparagraph. If more than one access channel across each oyster lease is identified, the holder of the authorization or permit shall designate a single access channel to the department in writing identifying the centerline of the access channel using the North American Datum 1983 state plane coordinates; and when the holder does so and the department consents to the designated access channel in writing, it shall be the sole access channel for purposes of this Item.

            (ii) For any activity, pipeline, well, platform, shell pad, or facility to which Subparagraph (2)(b) of this Subsection applies, the holder of the authorization or permit shall designate a single access channel across each oyster lease to the department in writing identifying its centerline using the North American Datum 1983 state plane coordinates; and when the holder does so and the department consents to the designated access channel in writing, it shall be the sole access channel for purposes of this Item.

            (iii) This Subparagraph applies only within fifty feet from the centerline of the access channel across each oyster lease. In addition, if a spoil area was previously identified in an authorization or permit for an access channel designated pursuant to this Item, this Item shall also apply to the same spoil area; however, such spoil area shall be limited to eighty feet in width adjacent to one side of the access channel.

            (iv) The department shall be immune from any action or liability arising out of or related to its consent or agreement to any access channel or spoil area designated pursuant to this Subparagraph.

            (v) The department shall consult with the lessee under any oyster lease located within a proposed access channel, before consenting or agreeing to any access channel pursuant to this Subparagraph.

            (3) The provisions of Paragraph (2) of this Subsection shall not apply to any oyster lease initially applied for before July 1, 2016, or any renewal or judicial partition of such lease, or to any oyster lease issued pursuant to Section 2(B)(1) of Acts 2008, No. 808, as amended by Acts 2016, No. 595 of the 2016 Regular Session or any renewal of such lease.

            B.(1) A lessee of oyster beds or grounds who has obtained, recorded, and marked his lease in compliance with the law shall have the right to maintain an action for damages against any person, partnership, corporation, or other entity causing wrongful or negligent injury or damage to the beds or grounds under lease to such lessee.

            (a) No lessee shall have any right to maintain any action against the state, any political subdivision of the state, the United States, or any agency, agent, contractor, or employee thereof for any claim arising from any project, plan, act, or activity in relation to integrated coastal protection, except as provided in R.S. 56:427.1.

            (b) No lessee shall have any right to maintain any action against any person arising from any activity to which R.S. 56:423(A)(2) applies provided that the person has not violated any coastal use permit, determination, or other coastal use authorization pursuant to R.S. 49:214.30, or drilling permit, or any Louisiana or federal law or regulation applicable to the activity.

            (2) No person shall trawl or seine or use skimmer nets over any area of privately leased bedding grounds or oyster propagating place in the year immediately following the seeding of such area which is staked off, marked, or posted as required by law or regulation. Any person who knowingly trawls or uses skimmer nets upon such marked areas shall be liable for damages caused to the lessee. A violation of this Paragraph shall be a class 2-B violation.

            (3) Any action for damages under this Section shall be brought within one year of the occurrence of the wrongful or negligent act, or within one year of the date of discovery of such act, whichever last occurs.

            C. In case of infringement of the interest in the taker or possessor, the taker or possessor may, in his own name, maintain his proper action against the wrongdoer. In case of larceny or other public offense concerning such oysters while in the hands of a lawful taker or possessor, or upon bedding grounds held by a lawful lessee, the ownership thereof shall be averred in the lessee, taker, possessor, when by law it is necessary to aver ownership.

            D. No claim to any water bottoms suitable for oyster culture by any person shall be valid until adjudicated upon by a court of competent jurisdiction in a suit between the state and the claimant. The claimant by virtue hereof may institute suit against the state in any court of competent jurisdiction for the legal determination of the validity of his claims, without the necessity of a special legislative act authorizing suit. The effect of the judgment is limited to an adjudication of the question of title.

            E. All leases, all applications of deceased persons for leases, and all property rights or interests acquired pursuant to such leases, made in conformity with the provisions of this Subpart are heritable and transferable. They are subject to mortgage, pledge or hypothecation, and to seizure and sale for debt, as any other property rights and credits in this state. This provision also applies to all buildings, betterments, and improvements thereon. No such inheritance or transfer is valid or of any force or effect whatsoever unless evidenced by an authentic act, judgment, or proper judicial deed registered in the office of the department in a book provided for that purpose. The department shall keep proper indexes, so that all original leases and all subsequent changes and transfers can be easily and accurately ascertained.

            Acts 1981, No. 925, §1; Acts 1990, No. 858, §1; Acts 1990, No. 889, §1, eff. July 25, 1990; Acts 1991, No. 788, §1; Acts 1992, No. 845, §1; Acts 1995, No. 234, §1; Acts 2006, No. 425, §1, eff. June 15, 2006; Acts 2016, No. 595, §1, eff. July 1, 2016; Acts 2021, No. 241, §1.

NOTE: SEE ACTS 1992, NO. 845, §2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2022 · leading case: Avenal v. State, 886 So. 2d 1085 (La. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Avenal v. State, 886 So. 2d 1085 (La. 2004). · cites it 9× “R.S. 56:423 as follows: A. A lessee shall enjoy the exclusive use of the water bottoms leased and of all oysters and cultch grown or placed thereon, subject to the restrictions and regulations of this subpart.”
Gi Joe, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. Pipeline Div., 561 So. 2d 62 (La. 1990). · cites it 11× “But, if the purpose of LSA-R.S. 56:423 were to protect a tortfeasor from double payment where a sublease is unrecorded, the Legislature would have expressly included subleases within the provisions of LSA-R.”
Jurisich v. Jenkins, 749 So. 2d 597 (La. 1999). · cites it 6× “R.S. 56:423(B) which provides, in pertinent part: *603 (1) A lessee of oyster beds or grounds who has obtained, recorded, and marked his lease in compliance with the law shall have the right to maintain an action for damages against any person, partnership, corporation or other…”
Avenal v. State, Dept. of Nat. Resources, 858 So. 2d 697 (La. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “R.S. 56:423 provides, in pertinent part: A.”
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 642 So. 2d 1243 (La. 1994). · cites it 4× “demonstrate the legislature's desire to create a special set of rules for water bottoms leased for oyster purposes, LSA-R.S. 56:423 is the clearest example of that intent.”
Slavich v. State, Ex Rel. Dept. of Wild. & Fish., 994 So. 2d 85 (La. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Thus, the property rights of an oyster lessee are exclusively defined in LSA-R.S. 56:423, which, prior to its amendment in 2006, provided, in pertinent part: A.”
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp. & Cf, 614 So. 2d 336 (La. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “It does not give to the lessee the State's right to recover for damage to the water bottoms. If lessee had not seeded the area, it can be assumed the majority would have awarded him the same damages less $21,360.”
Jurisich v. Hopson Marine Serv. Co., Inc., 619 So. 2d 1111 (La. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “See also LSA-R.S. 56:423(B). Thus, if plaintiffs' leases are valid, they have a judicially enforceable right to recover damages for any injuries to their leased property.”
Louisa Seafood Co. v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries Comm'n, 546 So. 2d 571 (La. Ct. App. 1989). “R.S. 56:423, et seq. Of pertinence to this case is Section 425, which provides in part as follows: A.”
Vekic v. Popich, 215 So. 3d 483 (La. Ct. App. 2017). “56:424(B), did not translate title ownership, unlike the "Sale of Oyster Leases Pursuant to [sic] R.S. 56:423(E). . Despite receiving notice of his eligibility and ultimately accepting BP settlement proceeds for those leases which he held a valid title, the DHECC denied his…”
Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club, 919 So. 2d 822 (La. Ct. App. 2006). “R.S. 56:423, et seq., which provided under section A that the secretary may lease any state-owned water bottoms, and stated under section D that the department may settle all disputes as to boundaries between lessees of bedding grounds.”
Jurisich v. Jenkins, 722 So. 2d 1008 (La. Ct. App. 1998). “Thus, the JURISICHS would have available an action for wrongful or negligent damage to their lease under LSA-R.S. 56:423 B(1). The trial court further ruled that pursuant to LSA-R.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
La. Rev. Stat. § 56:423(A): 2 cases
Avenal v. State, 886 So. 2d 1085 (La. 2004). “R.S. 56:423 as follows: A. A lessee shall enjoy the exclusive use of the water bottoms leased and of all oysters and cultch grown or placed thereon, subject to the restrictions and regulations of this subpart.”
Van Robin & Oyster Fisheries, Inc. v. Courtney Creighton-Smith (La. Ct. App. 2022).
La. Rev. Stat. § 56:423(B): 8 cases
Avenal v. State, 886 So. 2d 1085 (La. 2004). “R.S. 56:423 as follows: A. A lessee shall enjoy the exclusive use of the water bottoms leased and of all oysters and cultch grown or placed thereon, subject to the restrictions and regulations of this subpart.”
Gi Joe, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. Pipeline Div., 561 So. 2d 62 (La. 1990). “But, if the purpose of LSA-R.S. 56:423 were to protect a tortfeasor from double payment where a sublease is unrecorded, the Legislature would have expressly included subleases within the provisions of LSA-R.”
Jurisich v. Jenkins, 749 So. 2d 597 (La. 1999). “R.S. 56:423(B) which provides, in pertinent part: *603 (1) A lessee of oyster beds or grounds who has obtained, recorded, and marked his lease in compliance with the law shall have the right to maintain an action for damages against any person, partnership, corporation or other…”
Jurisich v. Hopson Marine Serv. Co., Inc., 619 So. 2d 1111 (La. Ct. App. 1993). “See also LSA-R.S. 56:423(B). Thus, if plaintiffs' leases are valid, they have a judicially enforceable right to recover damages for any injuries to their leased property.”
Slavich v. State, Ex Rel. Dept. of Wild. & Fish., 994 So. 2d 85 (La. Ct. App. 2008). “Thus, the property rights of an oyster lessee are exclusively defined in LSA-R.S. 56:423, which, prior to its amendment in 2006, provided, in pertinent part: A.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 56:423(B)(1): 4 cases
Jurisich v. Jenkins, 749 So. 2d 597 (La. 1999). “R.S. 56:423(B) which provides, in pertinent part: *603 (1) A lessee of oyster beds or grounds who has obtained, recorded, and marked his lease in compliance with the law shall have the right to maintain an action for damages against any person, partnership, corporation or other…”
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp., 642 So. 2d 1243 (La. 1994). “demonstrate the legislature's desire to create a special set of rules for water bottoms leased for oyster purposes, LSA-R.S. 56:423 is the clearest example of that intent.”
Avenal v. State, 886 So. 2d 1085 (La. 2004). “R.S. 56:423 as follows: A. A lessee shall enjoy the exclusive use of the water bottoms leased and of all oysters and cultch grown or placed thereon, subject to the restrictions and regulations of this subpart.”
Alexis v. Hilcorp Energy Co. (E.D. La. 2020).
La. Rev. Stat. § 56:423(E): 5 cases
Gi Joe, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. Pipeline Div., 561 So. 2d 62 (La. 1990). “But, if the purpose of LSA-R.S. 56:423 were to protect a tortfeasor from double payment where a sublease is unrecorded, the Legislature would have expressly included subleases within the provisions of LSA-R.”
Vekic v. Popich, 215 So. 3d 483 (La. Ct. App. 2017). “56:424(B), did not translate title ownership, unlike the "Sale of Oyster Leases Pursuant to [sic] R.S. 56:423(E). . Despite receiving notice of his eligibility and ultimately accepting BP settlement proceeds for those leases which he held a valid title, the DHECC denied his…”
Lulich v. Robin, 466 So. 2d 780 (La. Ct. App. 1985).
Est. of Petrovich v. Jules Melancon, Inc., 996 So. 2d 520 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
Van Robin & Oyster Fisheries, Inc. v. Courtney Creighton-Smith (La. Ct. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.