Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:429 (2026)
Repealed by Acts 1991, No. 235, §17, eff. January. 1, 1992.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
LA-LEGlegis.la.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§429. Repealed by Acts 1991, No. 235, §17, eff. January. 1, 1992.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases, 1963–1990 · leading case: In Re Rlv, 484 So. 2d 206 (La. Ct. App. 1986).
In Re Rlv, 484 So. 2d 206 (La. Ct. App. 1986). “R.S. 9:429? 3. Is the "authentic act" of voluntary surrender, provided for by La.”
In Re Cdt, 415 So. 2d 315 (La. Ct. App. 1982). “The plaintiffs argue that the provisions of LSA-R.S. 9:429, as amended by Acts 686 of 1979, permit the court to render an interlocutory decree of adoption if it finds the adoption in the best interest of the child.”
Durr v. Blue, 454 So. 2d 315 (La. Ct. App. 1984). “R.S. 9:429. Petitioner contends that these violations render the entire adoption a nullity.”
Bertrand v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 333 So. 2d 322 (La. Ct. App. 1976). “contends that the natural mother lost all of her rights to the child under the following provisions of LSA-R.S. 9:429: "After the interlocutory decree has been granted by the judge, the withdrawal of consent by the "legitimate parent or parents, by the mother or .”
In Re Hughes, 176 So. 2d 158 (La. Ct. App. 1965). “Paul, supra, and In re Byrd, supra, was modified by Act 268 of 1960 (LSA-R.S. 9:429) to provide that consent once given cannot be withdrawn after entry of interlocutory decree, except for cause.”
In Re Jmp, 528 So. 2d 1002 (La. 1988). “R.S. 9:429 recognizes that parental consent to a private adoption may validly be given in a notarial act that fails to meet all the requirements of La.”
In re J.M.P., 528 So. 2d 1002 (La. 1988). “R.S. 9:429 recognizes that parental consent to a private adoption may validly be given in a notarial act that fails to meet all the requirements of La.”
In Re Adoption of Giambrone, 262 So. 2d 566 (La. Ct. App. 1972). “Accordingly, LSA-R.S. 9:429 et seq. govern this case as to whether or not the judgment of September 9, 1971 shall be allowed to stand.”
Spell v. Bourque, 245 So. 2d 525 (La. Ct. App. 1971). “LSA-R.S. 9:429. The law provides that the “basic consideration” for determining whether an interlocutory decree should be granted “shall be the best interest of the child.”
In Re McK, 444 So. 2d 1362 (La. Ct. App. 1984). “The court " may grant or refuse to grant an interlocutory decree", LSA-R.S. 9:429, " may revoke its interlocutory decree", LSA-R.”
Moreland v. Craft, 244 So. 2d 37 (La. Ct. App. 1971). “The Crafts filed an exception of no right of action on the grounds that, under LSA-R.S. 9:429, the withdrawal of consent by the natural parent cannot bar a final decree of adoption.”
Matter of Adoption of Ms, 557 So. 2d 370 (La. Ct. App. 1990). “She further alleges that the juvenile court judge erred in granting a final decree of adoption rather than an interlocutory decree at the first hearing as required by LSA-R.S.9:429 and 9:432. Appellees in reply contend appellant failed to timely file the petition to annul the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.