La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:3150 (2026)

Exclusiveness

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§3150.  Exclusiveness

This Chapter provides the exclusive remedies, warranties, and peremptive periods as between builder and owner relative to home construction and no other provisions of law relative to warranties and redhibitory vices and defects shall apply. Nothing herein shall be construed as affecting or limiting any warranty of title to land or improvements.  

Acts 1986, No. 676, §1; Acts 2003, No. 333, §1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2022 · leading case: Carter v. Duhe, 921 So. 2d 963 (La. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Carter v. Duhe, 921 So. 2d 963 (La. 2006). · cites it 4× “La.Rev.Stat. § 9:3150 is likewise mandatory and states the act "provides the exclusive remedies, warranties, and peremptive periods as between builder and owner relative to home construction and no other provisions of law relative to warranties and redhibitory vices and defects…”
Robinson v. Wayne & Beverly Papania & Pyrenees Investments, LLC, 207 So. 3d 566 (La. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “R.S. 9:3150, Pyrenees and LeBlanc maintain that, as a matter of law, the Papanias may not assert an independent claim of fraud.”
Stutts v. Melton, 130 So. 3d 808 (La. 2013). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:3150. *812 Based on this exclusivity provision, the Meltons argue, and the court of appeal agreed, that the Stutts can have no other cause of action against them arising from the defective roof other than under the NHWA.”
Hutcherson v. Harvey Smith Constr., Inc., 7 So. 3d 775 (La. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “LSA-R.S. 9:3150; [2] Carter v. Duhe, 05-0390 (La.”
Barnett v. Watkins, 970 So. 2d 1028 (La. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:3150 (Emphasis supplied). [4] The NHWA's "minimum required warranties" are mandatory, and cannot be waived by the owner or reduced by the builder.”
Nolan v. Roofing Supply, Inc., 833 So. 2d 1026 (La. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “R.S. 9:3150 demonstrates that the New Home Warranty Act from its inception was intended to apply to any defective work or material.”
Pumphrey v. Harris, 111 So. 3d 86 (La. Ct. App. 2012). “R.S. 9:3150; Hutcherson v. Harvey Smith Const.”
Dalme v. Blockers Manufactured Homes, Inc., 779 So. 2d 1014 (La. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:3150 provides: This Chapter provides the exclusive remedies, warranties, and prescriptive periods as between builder and owner relative to home construction and no other provisions of law relative to warranties and redhibitory vices and defects shall apply.”
Cosman v. Cabrera, 28 So. 3d 1075 (La. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “, pursuant to the New Home Warranty Act (NHWA) at LSA-R.S. 9:3141, et seq. We find no merit to this argument.”
Allemand v. Discovery Homes, Inc., 38 So. 3d 1183 (La. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:3150; Barnett , 2006-2442 at p. 10, 970 So.”
Paragon Lofts Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Paragon Lofts, L.L.C., 55 So. 3d 970 (La. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:3150. The NHWA was originally enacted in 1986 and amended in 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2003.”
Williams v. Wood, 258 So. 3d 834 (La. Ct. App. 2018). “R.S. 9:3150. The NHWA provides the following express warranties: A.”
Show all 40 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.