Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-305 (2026)

When possession by secured party perfects security interest without filing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 526, §44 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 625, §13 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 429, §C26 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1995 · leading case: Doughty v. Sullivan, 661 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1995).
Doughty v. Sullivan, 661 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1995). “§ 9-203 (1994), the trial court had an adequate basis for concluding that Ethe-lyn did not perfect her interest before the sale occurred pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-305 (1994). In addition, the trial court had an adequate basis for concluding that Amos gave value and received…”
A-I Credit Corp. v. Big Squaw Mountain Corp. (In Re Big Squaw Mountain Corp.), 122 B.R. 831 (Bankr. D. Me. 1990). “11 M.R.S.A. § 9-305. Cf. In re Van Kylen, 98 B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.