Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1151 (2026)
Controversies referable; powers of referees; revocation by consent
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All controversies which may be the subject of a personal action may be submitted to one or more referees, with the same powers as those appointed by the court. The parties personally or by attorney may sign and acknowledge an agreement before a notary public, although he is one of the referees, in substance as follows:
"Know all men by these presents, that ...., of ...., in the County of ...., and ...., of ...., in the County of ...., have agreed to submit the demand made by said ...., against said ...., which is hereunto annexed," (and all other demands between the parties, as the case may be,) "to the determination of ...., .... and ....; and judgment rendered on their report, or that of a majority of them, made to the Superior Court for the said County of ...., within one year from this day, shall be final. And if either party neglects to appear before the referees, after proper notice given to him of the time and place appointed for hearing the parties, they may proceed in his absence.
Dated this .... day of ...., A.D., 19.... ."
[PL 1981, c. 456, Pt. A, §128 (AMD).]Such agreement shall not be revoked without mutual consent, but the parties may agree when the report shall be made and vary the form accordingly.
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 456, §A128 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2017–2018 · leading case: Est. of Gilbert, 2017 ME 175, 169 A.3d 382.
Est. of Gilbert, 2017 ME 175, 169 A.3d 382. “14 M.R.S. §§ 1151, 1153, 1154; M.R, Civ. P.”
Est. of Libby, 2018 ME 1, 176 A.3d 1287. “1 14 M.R.S. § 1151 (2017); M.R. Prob. P. 53; M.”
Est. of Gilbert, 2017 ME 175, 169 A.3d 382. “14 M.R.S. §§ 1151, 1153, 1154; M.R, Civ. P.”
Est. of Gilbert, 2017 ME 175, 169 A.3d 382. “14 M.R.S. §§ 1151, 1153, 1154; M.R, Civ. P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.