Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505 (2026)

Grounds for nonrecognition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1999, c. 285, §1 (NEW). PL 2021, c. 689, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2020 · leading case: GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). · cites it 11× “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
Genujolok Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn (Me. Super. Ct 2007). · cites it 6× “" 14 M.R.S. § 8505. Zorn argues that a number of these conditions exist here.”
State v. Md Helicopters Inc (Ariz. 2020). · cites it 2× “605(2)(g); Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(2)(G); Mass.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(1): 1 case
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(1)(A): 1 case
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(1)(B): 2 cases
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
Genujolok Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “" 14 M.R.S. § 8505. Zorn argues that a number of these conditions exist here.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(1)(C): 1 case
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(2): 1 case
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(2)(B): 1 case
Genujolok Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “" 14 M.R.S. § 8505. Zorn argues that a number of these conditions exist here.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(2)(G): 3 cases
GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn, 943 A.2d 573 (Me. 2008). “Section 8505, entitled “Grounds for nonrecognition,” lists three grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment is not conclusive,” 4 14 M.R.S. § 8505(1), and seven grounds upon which “[a] foreign judgment need not be recognized,” 5 14 M.”
State v. Md Helicopters Inc (Ariz. 2020). “605(2)(g); Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 8505(2)(G); Mass.”
Genujolok Beteiligungs GmbH v. Zorn (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “" 14 M.R.S. § 8505. Zorn argues that a number of these conditions exist here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.