Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 15
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 2714 (2026)

Commitment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 195, §4 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 191 (AMD). P&SL 1973, c. 53 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 788, §64 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 62, §4 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 538, §9 (RPR). PL 1975, c. 756, §7 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 127, §117 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 169 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 459, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1968–1974 · leading case: Shone v. State, 237 A.2d 412 (Me. 1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shone v. State, 237 A.2d 412 (Me. 1968). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2714. Transferred from the Center to the Reformatory for Men on or about May 28, 1967 under 15 M.”
State v. L D, 320 A.2d 885 (Me. 1974). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2714. To the extent that a finding of aggravation in a criminal trial allows for longer statutorily prescribed periods of incarcaration for adult offenders, it has no parallel function in a juvenile proceeding, where all commitments are for the same term.”
Shone v. State of Maine, 286 F. Supp. 511 (D. Me. 1968). “” See 15 M.R.S.A. § 2714 (1964). Petitioner did not appeal either the finding that he had committed the offense or the disposition of his ease, see 15 M.”
State v. L D, 320 A.2d 885 (Me. 1974). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2714. To the extent that a finding of aggravation in a criminal trial allows for longer statutorily prescribed periods of in-carcaration for adult offenders, it has no parallel function in a juvenile proceeding, where all commitments are for the same term.”
State v. L D, 320 A.2d 885 (Me. 1974). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2714. To the extent that a finding of aggravation in a criminal trial allows for longer statutorily prescribed periods of in-carcaration for adult offenders, it has no parallel function in a juvenile proceeding, where all commitments are for the same term.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.