Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 23, § 3006 (2026)

Refusal or neglect of municipal officers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 711, §7 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–1984 · leading case: Brown v. Warchalowski, 471 A.2d 1026 (Me. 1984).
Brown v. Warchalowski, 471 A.2d 1026 (Me. 1984). · cites it 16× “(5) The Referee erred as a matter of law in refusing to hold that 23 M.R.S.A. § 3006 is unconstitutional. In his report which the Superior Court Justice accepted and which provides the basis of the instant judgment in favor of the Appellee Warchalowski, the Referee determined…”
Comber v. Inhabitants of Plantation of Dennistown, 398 A.2d 376 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “” Comber then petitioned the County Commissioners pursuant to former 23 M.R.S.A. § 3006 (1964) (repealed effective July 29, *380 1976) 6 to lay out Rancourt Road as a public way.”
Warchalowski v. Brown, 417 A.2d 425 (Me. 1980). “The Buckfield Selectmen denied the petition on November 4, 1971, prompting War-chalowski and his co-owners two weeks later to petition the Oxford County Commissioners pursuant to former 23 M.R.S.A. § 3006 (1964) (repealed effective July 29, 1976) 4 to lay out the private way.”
Brown v. MacDonald, 448 A.2d 912 (Me. 1982). · cites it 2× “Acting on that single objection, this Court remanded the Rule 80B review for a determination by the Superior Court whether the Oxford County Commissioners had actually made the necessary determination under 23 M.R.S.A. § 3006 3 (since repealed) that the Buckfield selectmen had…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.