Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 24-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 24-A, § 211 (2026)

General powers, duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  The superintendent shall enforce the provisions of, and execute the duties imposed upon the superintendent by, this Title.  
[RR 2021, c. 1, Pt. B, §155 (COR).]
2.  The superintendent has the powers and authority expressly vested in the superintendent by or reasonably implied from this Title.  
[RR 2021, c. 1, Pt. B, §156 (COR).]
3.  The superintendent shall have such additional rights, powers and duties as may be provided by other laws.  
[PL 1696, c. 132, §1 (NEW); PL 1973, c. 585, §12 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1969, c. 132, §1 (NEW). PL 1973, c. 585, §12 (AMD). RR 2021, c. 1, Pt. B, §§155, 156 (COR).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2009 · leading case: Knowlton v. Attorney Gen., 976 A.2d 973 (Me. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Knowlton v. Attorney Gen., 976 A.2d 973 (Me. 2009). “See 24-A M.R.S. § 211 (2008); 10 M.R.S. §§ 8001(3) (2008); 8003(5)(A-1) (2008).”
Campbell v. First Am. Title Ins., 644 F. Supp. 2d 126 (D. Me. 2009). “Although First American repeatedly cites the Superintendent's broad generic enforcement authority, see 24-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211, 214, 2329, 2165-A, it has provided no evidence respecting the manner in which this authority is typically exercised.”
Nat'l Council on Comp. Ins. v. Superintendent of Ins., 538 A.2d 759 (Me. 1988). “" That claim renewed on appeal has not been mooted (despite the repeal of section 2350) because the residual market mechanism created by the Superintendent’s mandatory assignment order continues to operate until the Superintendent modifies or suspends his order. See P.L.1987,…”
Nat. Coun. on Comp. Ins. v. Super. of Ins., 538 A.2d 759 (Me. 1988). “" That claim renewed on appeal has not been mooted (despite the repeal of section 2350) because the residual market mechanism created by the Superintendent's mandatory assignment order continues to operate until the Superintendent modifies or suspends his order. See P.L.1987,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.