Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 24-A, § 220 (2026)

Investigation of violations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Discretionary investigations.  In addition to examinations and investigations expressly authorized, the superintendent may conduct investigations of insurance matters as the superintendent considers proper upon reasonable cause to determine whether any person has violated any provision of this Title or to secure information useful in the lawful administration of any such provision. The cost of these investigations must be borne by the State.  
[PL 1991, c. 26 (NEW).]
2.  Response to inquiries.  All insurers and other persons required to be licensed pursuant to this Title and Title 24 shall respond to all lawful inquiries of the superintendent within 10 business days of receipt of the inquiry and to all follow-up inquiries of the superintendent within 5 business days of receipt. If a substantive response cannot in good faith be provided within the required time, the person required to respond shall so advise the superintendent and provide the reason for the inability to respond. The superintendent may adopt routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A to implement the requirements of this subsection.  
[PL 2023, c. 59, §1 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1969, c. 132, §1 (NEW). PL 1973, c. 585, §12 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 26 (RPR). PL 2023, c. 59, §1 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Paul A. Dyer v. Superintendent of Ins., 2013 ME 61 (Me. 2013).
Paul A. Dyer v. Superintendent of Ins., 2013 ME 61 (Me. 2013). · cites it 2× “According to the Bureau’s allegations, Dyer’s conduct violated the following provisions of the insurance code: 24-A M.R.S. § 220 (2012) (requiring a licensee to make a substantive response to all lawful requests by the Superintendent), 24-A *421 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.