Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 26
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 1041 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Employment Security Law".  
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1966–2017 · leading case: Toothaker v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 217 A.2d 203 (Me. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Toothaker v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 217 A.2d 203 (Me. 1966). · cites it 2× “29 (now 26 M.R.S.A. § 1041 et seq.) The case requires: (1) the interpretation of the disqualification for benefits provision for leaving work "voluntarily without good cause attributable to such employment" under R.”
Cotton v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 431 A.2d 637 (Me. 1981). “the Employment Security Law, 26 M.R.S.A. § 1041 et seq., expressly makes the provisions of the Maine Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.”
Page v. Gen. Elec. Co., 391 A.2d 303 (Me. 1978). “The “Unemployment Compensation Law,” predecessor of the current Employment Security Law, 26 M.R.S.A. § 1041 et seq., was enacted in 1936 (P.”
Sewall v. Taylor, 672 F. Supp. 542 (D. Me. 1987). “This Court is considering constitutional claims arising from Plaintiff’s discharge, whereas the Commission was determining the narrower question of whether Plaintiff was entitled to unemployment benefits under the applicable state statute, 26 M.R.S.A. § 1041 et seq. The…”
G. H. Bass & Co. v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 250 A.2d 492 (Me. 1969). “26 M.R.S.A. § 1041 et seq. The pertinent provisions of the Act are as follows: 26 M.”
Sarah E. Cheney v. Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 2016 ME 105 (Me. 2016). “Public Policy [¶ 15] Cheney argues that the Commission’s result is contrary to public policy because she is denied the protection of the Employment Security Law, see 26 M.R.S. § 1041 (2015), despite being willing and available to work full time.”
Goddard v. Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co., 234 A.2d 326 (Me. 1967). “The Maine Employment Security Law (Act) appears in 26 M.R.S.A. § 1041 through § 1251, and sections hereinafter cited refer to the Act.”
Cheney v. Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 149 A.3d 262 (Me. 2016). “Public Policy [¶ 15] Cheney argues that the Commission’s result is contrary to public policy because she is denied the protection of the Employment Security Law, see 26 M.R.S. § 1041 (2015), despite being willing and available to work full time.”
Schleis v. Maine Unemployment Ins. Comm'n (Me. Super. Ct 2017). “, an individual shall be disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits "[£]or the duration of the individual's unemployment subsequent to the individual's having refused to accept an offer of suitable work for which the individual is reasonably fitted . . . ." 26 M.R.S. §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.