Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 6 (2026)

Interlocutory appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A party may appeal to the law court from an interlocutory order granting or denying a preliminary injunction in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, but such a preliminary injunction may not be stayed by the taking of such an appeal. Any such appeal must be heard at the first term of the law court commencing not less than 14 days after the appellant has filed the record on appeal with the clerk of the Superior Court and furnished the required copies of the appellant's brief to the clerk of the law court. Copies of the briefs of other parties must be furnished to the clerk of the law court not more than 10 days after the appellant's brief has been filed. The law court shall affirm, modify or set aside the order with the greatest possible expedition and shall give such proceedings precedence over all other matters except older matters of the same character.   [RR 2023, c. 2, Pt. E, §1 (COR).]
SECTION HISTORY
RR 2023, c. 2, Pt. E, §1 (COR).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–1984 · leading case: Bancroft & Martin v. LOCAL NO. 340, ETC., 412 A.2d 1216 (Me. 1980).
Bancroft & Martin v. LOCAL NO. 340, ETC., 412 A.2d 1216 (Me. 1980). · cites it 2× “340, Truck Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, appeals pursuant to 26 M.R.S.A. § 6 from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, granting a preliminary injunction which enjoined the defendant and its members, who were on strike and picketing outside…”
Council 74, Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, 476 A.2d 699 (Me. 1984). “26 M.R.S.A. § 6 (1974). AFSCME argues that the incorporation of section 6 into section 968(5)(F) contemplates an adoption only of the expedited appellate procedure described in section 6, once the Board has resolved all issues and they have been finally reviewed by the Superior…”
Mearl Corp. v. State Tax Assessor, 482 A.2d 1258 (Me. 1984). “The plaintiff had successfully petitioned for a preliminary injunction and the defendant had exercised its right to appeal the issuance of that injunction pursuant to 26 M.R.S. § 6 (1974) when the plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal pursuant to M.”
Sanford Teachers Ass'n v. Sanford Sch. Comm., 409 A.2d 244 (Me. 1979). “§ 968(5)(F) prescribes that the Superior Court “shall set the complaint down for hearing at the earliest possible time,” and any appeal to the Law Court is given the same priority treatment that is accorded to appeals from preliminary injunctions in labor disputes under 26…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.