Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 26

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 834

Civil actions for injunctive relief or other remedies

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REALLOCATED FROM TITLE 26, SECTION 824)
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 452 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 583, §15 (RAL). PL 1983, c. 816, §A18 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 782, §5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2021 · leading case: Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc. (2012) me “4, 1988) (repealing 26 M.R.S.A. § 834). The same legislation that eliminated that claim also amended the MHRA to make it unlawful for employers to discriminate based on actions protected by the WPA.”
Bernard Nadeau v. Twin Rivers Paper Company, LLC (2021) me “” 26 M.R.S. § 834. [¶66] Upon receiving a complaint, the Maine Human Rights Commission will conduct a preliminary investigation, after which it may order a dismissal of the complaint, seek conciliation, file a civil action, or provide the complainant with a right-to-sue letter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.