Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 834 (2026)

Civil actions for injunctive relief or other remedies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REALLOCATED FROM TITLE 26, SECTION 824)
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 452 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 583, §15 (RAL). PL 1983, c. 816, §A18 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 782, §5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2021 · leading case: Fuhrmann v. Staples the Off. Superstore East, Inc., 58 A.3d 1083 (Me. 2012).
Fuhrmann v. Staples the Off. Superstore East, Inc., 58 A.3d 1083 (Me. 2012). “4, 1988) (repealing 26 M.R.S.A. § 834). The same legislation that eliminated that claim also amended the MHRA to make it unlawful for employers to discriminate based on actions protected by the WPA.”
Bernard Nadeau v. Twin Rivers Paper Co., LLC, 2021 ME 16 (Me. 2021). “” 26 M.R.S. § 834. [¶66] Upon receiving a complaint, the Maine Human Rights Commission will conduct a preliminary investigation, after which it may order a dismissal of the complaint, seek conciliation, file a civil action, or provide the complainant with a right-to-sue letter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.