Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2122 (2026)

Inspection required biannually; equipment tested

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 128 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 202, §3 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 248, §7 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 301 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 245, §26 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 443, §1 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 108 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 69, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 360, §46 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 291, §2 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 788, §§129-A (AMD). PL 1975, c. 731, §§59,59-A (AMD). PL 1977, c. 268, §1 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 364, §4 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 464, §3 (RP). PL 1979, c. 663, §173 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1976–1985 · leading case: Thurber v. Bill Martin Chevrolet, Inc., 487 A.2d 631 (Me. 1985).
Thurber v. Bill Martin Chevrolet, Inc., 487 A.2d 631 (Me. 1985). · cites it 2× “In relevant part, the Used Car Information Act imposes a duty on motor vehicle dealers to sell only vehicles that meet the State inspection requirements, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2122, and that have, in fact, been inspected.”
Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Jud. Court, 355 A.2d 341 (Me. 1976). “29 MRSA § 2122, 1st ¶, last 2 sentences are amended to read: ¥fee owner or operator oí ©aid vehicle ©had produce tfee certificate of inopcc-tie» upon demand of any p©dee effieer- It shall be unlawful, except as otherwise provided, for any person to operate a vehicle on the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.