Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2241-G (2026)

Provisional license

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 694, §526 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 478 (RPR). PL 1983, c. 850, §4 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 402, §§8,9 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 366, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 481, §§A26,A27 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 866, §§B20,26 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 363, §2 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–1990 · leading case: State v. RYNE G., 509 A.2d 1164 (Me. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. RYNE G., 509 A.2d 1164 (Me. 1986). · cites it 8× “In support of his contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress, Ryne first argues that the legislature never intended that the results of a blood-alcohol test obtained pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G would be admissible in a criminal proceeding.”
Maines v. Sec'y of State, 493 A.2d 326 (Me. 1985). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs’ drivers’ licenses were suspended by the State as of August 12 and August 30,1983, respectively, for violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)(B) (Supp.1984), promulgated as part of an act to deter teenage drinking and driving.”
Koren v. Sec'y of State, Motor Veh. Div., 574 A.2d 895 (Me. 1990). · cites it 3× “The Secretary suspended Koren’s license pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)(B) (Supp.1989) for operating a *896 motor vehicle with more than 0.”
State v. Hunt, 556 A.2d 653 (Me. 1989). · cites it 3× “After subjecting defendant to certain field sobriety tests, the officer determined that although there was no probable cause to believe that defendant was operating under the influence, there was probable cause to believe that he was in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)…”
Merrill v. Sec'y of State, 494 A.2d 1383 (Me. 1985). “Merrill appeals from judgments of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, affirming his license suspension imposed by the Secretary of State under the “Teen Drinking Law,” 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G (Supp.1984) and dismissing Merrill’s claim for relief under 42 U.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2241-G(2): 1 case
State v. Hunt, 556 A.2d 653 (Me. 1989). “After subjecting defendant to certain field sobriety tests, the officer determined that although there was no probable cause to believe that defendant was operating under the influence, there was probable cause to believe that he was in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2241-G(2)(B): 4 cases
State v. RYNE G., 509 A.2d 1164 (Me. 1986). “In support of his contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress, Ryne first argues that the legislature never intended that the results of a blood-alcohol test obtained pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G would be admissible in a criminal proceeding.”
Maines v. Sec'y of State, 493 A.2d 326 (Me. 1985). “The plaintiffs’ drivers’ licenses were suspended by the State as of August 12 and August 30,1983, respectively, for violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)(B) (Supp.1984), promulgated as part of an act to deter teenage drinking and driving.”
Koren v. Sec'y of State, Motor Veh. Div., 574 A.2d 895 (Me. 1990). “The Secretary suspended Koren’s license pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)(B) (Supp.1989) for operating a *896 motor vehicle with more than 0.”
State v. Hunt, 556 A.2d 653 (Me. 1989). “After subjecting defendant to certain field sobriety tests, the officer determined that although there was no probable cause to believe that defendant was operating under the influence, there was probable cause to believe that he was in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2241-G(2)(C): 1 case
State v. Hunt, 556 A.2d 653 (Me. 1989). “After subjecting defendant to certain field sobriety tests, the officer determined that although there was no probable cause to believe that defendant was operating under the influence, there was probable cause to believe that he was in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2241-G(2)(K)(2): 1 case
Koren v. Sec'y of State, Motor Veh. Div., 574 A.2d 895 (Me. 1990). “The Secretary suspended Koren’s license pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2241-G(2)(B) (Supp.1989) for operating a *896 motor vehicle with more than 0.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.