Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 547 (2026)

Medical Advisory Board

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1971, c. 464 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 293, §4 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 162 (RPR). PL 1983, c. 812, §175 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 481, §A21 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 758, §11 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1989–1990 · leading case: Gross v. Sec'y of State, 562 A.2d 667 (Me. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gross v. Sec'y of State, 562 A.2d 667 (Me. 1989). · cites it 3× “§§ 781-791 (1989), and that the 1988 regulations were adopted by a process inconsistent with that required by 29 M.R.S.A. § 547 (Supp.1988). The plaintiffs also claimed that the 1988 regulations violate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.”
Davis v. Sec'y of State, Div. of Motor Vehs., 577 A.2d 338 (Me. 1990). · cites it 2× “29 M.R.S.A. § 547 (Supp.1989) provides for the establishment of a Medical Advisory Board and for the promulgation of regulations to establish guidelines defining what constitutes an adverse medical condition.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 547(2)(A) — 1 case
Gross v. Sec'y of State, 562 A.2d 667 (Me. 1989). “§§ 781-791 (1989), and that the 1988 regulations were adopted by a process inconsistent with that required by 29 M.R.S.A. § 547 (Supp.1988). The plaintiffs also claimed that the 1988 regulations violate section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 547(3) — 1 case
Davis v. Sec'y of State, Div. of Motor Vehs., 577 A.2d 338 (Me. 1990). “29 M.R.S.A. § 547 (Supp.1989) provides for the establishment of a Medical Advisory Board and for the promulgation of regulations to establish guidelines defining what constitutes an adverse medical condition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.