Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 31, § 1601 (2026)

Application of assets in winding up limited liability company's activities

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon the winding up of a limited liability company, the assets must be applied as follows.   [PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).]
1.  Payment to creditors.  Payment, or adequate provision for payment, must be made to creditors, including, to the extent permitted by law, members who are creditors, in satisfaction of liabilities of the limited liability company.  
[PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).]
2.  Surplus.  After a limited liability company complies with subsection 1, any surplus must be distributed:  
A. To each person owning a transferable interest that reflects contributions made on account of such transferable interest and not previously returned, in an amount equal to the value of the unreturned contributions; and   [PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).]
B. After the distribution under paragraph A, to each person owning a transferable interest in the proportions in which the owners of transferable interests share in distributions prior to dissolution.   [PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).]
[PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).]
3.  Distribution in proportion to value.  If the limited liability company does not have sufficient surplus to comply with subsection 2, paragraph A, any surplus must be distributed among the owners of transferable interests in proportion to the value of their respective unreturned contributions.  
[PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §2 (NEW). PL 2009, c. 629, Pt. A, §3 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Beaulieu v. Campbell (Me. Super. Ct 2018).
Beaulieu v. Campbell (Me. Super. Ct 2018). · cites it 2× “The Court must then turn to 31 M.R.S. § 1601 to determine how the company's assets must be applied.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 31, § 1601(2)(B): 1 case
Beaulieu v. Campbell (Me. Super. Ct 2018). “The Court must then turn to 31 M.R.S. § 1601 to determine how the company's assets must be applied.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.