Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 3282 (2026)

Complaints; allegations; grounds for investigation and hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1971, c. 591, §1 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 388, §9 (RPR). PL 1977, c. 694, §610 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 619, §1 (RPR). PL 1983, c. 176, §A17 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 378, §52 (RP). PL 1985, c. 506, §A69 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Bd. of Reg. in Med. v. Fiorica, 488 A.2d 1371 (Me. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Reg. in Med. v. Fiorica, 488 A.2d 1371 (Me. 1985). · cites it 8× “Fiorica appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) affirming a decision of the Administrative Court revoking his license to practice medicine under 32 M.R.S.A. § 3282 (1978 and Supp.1983). We find no error in the Administrative Court’s decision and,…”
Gashgai v. Bd. of Reg. in Med., 390 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1978). · cites it 3× “In this case we are not required to address the question of whether a physician can be found to have committed “unprofessional conduct” within 32 M.R.S.A. § 3282 by negligently supervising, or failing to supervise, his non-physician staff.”
Nass v. Maine Bd. of Licensure in Med. (D. Me. 2024). “In Count 4, brought against the Board only, Nass alleges that 32 M.R.S. § 3282‑A, as construed by the Position Statement and as applied to her, violates free speech and due process guarantees under the Maine Constitution, Me.”
Daly v. Bd. of Licensure in Med. (Me. Super. Ct 2002). “" Here the Board, in its letter of May 21, 2001, never informed Dr.”
Lentz v. Maine State Bd.of Licensure in Med. (Me. Super. Ct 2004). “The Board noted 32 M.R.S.A. § 3282- A(2): ... the following are grounds for an action to refuse to issue, modify, restrict, suspend, revoke or refuse to renew the license of an individual licensed under this chapter: A.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 3282(1): 1 case
Bd. of Reg. in Med. v. Fiorica, 488 A.2d 1371 (Me. 1985). “Fiorica appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) affirming a decision of the Administrative Court revoking his license to practice medicine under 32 M.R.S.A. § 3282 (1978 and Supp.1983). We find no error in the Administrative Court’s decision and,…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 3282(5): 1 case
Gashgai v. Bd. of Reg. in Med., 390 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1978). “In this case we are not required to address the question of whether a physician can be found to have committed “unprofessional conduct” within 32 M.R.S.A. § 3282 by negligently supervising, or failing to supervise, his non-physician staff.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 3282(5)(G): 1 case
Bd. of Reg. in Med. v. Fiorica, 488 A.2d 1371 (Me. 1985). “Fiorica appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) affirming a decision of the Administrative Court revoking his license to practice medicine under 32 M.R.S.A. § 3282 (1978 and Supp.1983). We find no error in the Administrative Court’s decision and,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.