Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 291 (2026)

Complaints

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 141, §1 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1976–1981 · leading case: Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 405 A.2d 153 (Me. 1979).
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 405 A.2d 153 (Me. 1979). · cites it 4× “Jurisdiction was alleged under 35 M.R.S.A. § 291. The MODA complaint was docketed as F.”
Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 381 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1977). “35 M.R.S.A. § 291 et seq. 15 Were we to make independent findings of fact under § 305, we would not only be duplicating a Commission function, but we may well be impermissibly treading into the legislative sphere.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 414 A.2d 1217 (Me. 1980). · cites it 2× “By complaints filed on March 22, April 3, and April 9, 1979, pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 291, 2 the Maine Committee for Utility Rate Reform (the “Maine Committee”) and other named individuals challenged the “justness and reasonableness” of passing through to the ratepayers…”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978). “35 M.R.S.A. § 291 requires ten aggrieved persons to initiate a petition for a rate investigation.”
First Hartford Corp. v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 425 A.2d 174 (Me. 1981). · cites it 2× “On January 28, 1975, acting pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 291 (1978), First Hartford Corporation and nine individuals filed a complaint with the Public Utilities Commission (the Commission) against Central Maine Power Company (CMP).”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 362 A.2d 741 (Me. 1976). “Public Utilities Commission, supra, Section 294 is the source of the Commission’s authority to order utilities to substitute just and reasonable rates for those found unjust and unreasonable, whether the procedure is commenced by complaint by 10 persons aggrieved (35 M.R.S.A. §…”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 436 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981). “129, § 41 (now 35 M.R.S.A. § 291), by the Commission’s own motion, id.”
In Re Powell, 358 A.2d 522 (Me. 1976). “No grant of additional authority, the argument continues, should have been allowed until the existing carrier had been given an opportunity to furnish such additional service.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.