Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 3 (2026)

Rules; assistance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 438, §1 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1969–1978 · leading case: Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978). · cites it 2× “Promulgated pursuant to Commission power granted by 35 M.R.S.A. § 3, Rule 16.1 permits intervention only by: “[pjersons, .”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Maine Cent. R.R., 343 A.2d 877 (Me. 1975). · cites it 2× “35 M.R.S.A. § 3 confers upon the Commission authority to “.”
WINDSOR HOTEL Co. v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 250 A.2d 194 (Me. 1969). “§ 3) and by “Rules and Standards of Service for Electrical Companies” effective August 1, 1930, and to the date of this case not pertinently amended, Rule 26 provided inter alia that “where a dangerous condition is found to exist on the customer’s premises, the service may be…”
In Re Lefebvre, 343 A.2d 204 (Me. 1975). “It is well settled that the Commission can issue a certificate granting additional authority to a common carrier only if the “public necessity and convenience require” it, 6 the burden always being on an applicant to so demonstrate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.