Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 35, § 308 (2026)

Practice and rules of evidence; process service

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 481, §C17 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 141, §A5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1975–1989 · leading case: Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 382 A.2d 302 (Me. 1978). “35 M.R.S.A. § 308; see also 35 M.R. S.A. § 299.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 405 A.2d 153 (Me. 1979). “In its decisions with respect to procedural matters, the Commission assumes a status comparable to a court, bound by both its own rules promulgated pursuant to 35 M.”
Berry v. Maine Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 394 A.2d 790 (Me. 1978). “” Similarly, evidentiary rules controlling in the Superior Court apply in such hearings, 35 M.R.S.A. § 308. See also, relevant portions of the Maine Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.”
Scott v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 709 F. Supp. 1176 (D. Me. 1989). “6 In addition, Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 35, § 308 (1978) (repealed and replaced by Me.”
First Hartford Corp. v. Cent. Maine Power Co., 425 A.2d 174 (Me. 1981). “CMP’s motion before the Commission for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure was authorized by 35 M.R.S.A. § 308 (1978). There is no merit to First Hartford’s contention that by issuing its notice of complaint pursuant to 35 M.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Maine Cent. R.R., 343 A.2d 877 (Me. 1975). · cites it 2× “, as applied to Commission proceedings pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 308, the purported “appellants” were not formal parties by operation of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.