Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 36
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 36, § 946-A (2026)

Tax-acquired property and the restriction of title action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1993, c. 82, §1 (NEW). PL 1995, c. 20, §1 (RPR). PL 2013, c. 521, Pt. D, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2016 · leading case: DiVeto v. Kjellgren, 2004 ME 133 (Me. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DiVeto v. Kjellgren, 2004 ME 133 (Me. 2004). · cites it 8× “The DiVetos contend, inter alia, that the motion court erred by failing to apply the tax lien statute of limitations provisions set forth in 36 M.R.S.A § 946-A (Supp.2003). The Kjell-grens also appeal, contending that a genuine issue of material fact exists relating to *620…”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust v. Warner (Me. Super. Ct 2009). · cites it 2× “Berry's property are void because the tax liens recorded by the Town of Parsonsfield were too vague or imprecise to identify the property on which the lien was being applied. Complaint j[ j[ 9, II, 13. From this, Deutsche argues that the notices of lien are void.”
Town of Carthage v. Friends of Maine's Mountains, 2016 ME 38 (Me. 2016). “See 36 M.R.S.A. § 946-A (Supp. 1993) (“A person may not commence an action against the validity of a governmental taking of real estate for nonpayment of property taxes upon the expiration of a 15-year period immediately following the expiration of the period of redemption.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 36, § 946-A(2): 1 case
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust v. Warner (Me. Super. Ct 2009). “Berry's property are void because the tax liens recorded by the Town of Parsonsfield were too vague or imprecise to identify the property on which the lien was being applied. Complaint j[ j[ 9, II, 13. From this, Deutsche argues that the notices of lien are void.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 36, § 946-A(3): 1 case
DiVeto v. Kjellgren, 2004 ME 133 (Me. 2004). “The DiVetos contend, inter alia, that the motion court erred by failing to apply the tax lien statute of limitations provisions set forth in 36 M.R.S.A § 946-A (Supp.2003). The Kjell-grens also appeal, contending that a genuine issue of material fact exists relating to *620…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.