Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 341 (2026)

Department

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1971, c. 618, §8 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 771, §418 (RPR). PL 1977, c. 78, §202 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 213, §4 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 812, §289 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 890, §§A12,40 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: Concerned Citizens to Save Roxbury v. Bd. of Env't Prot., 15 A.3d 1263 (Me. 2011).
Concerned Citizens to Save Roxbury v. Bd. of Env't Prot., 15 A.3d 1263 (Me. 2011). “” 38 M.R.S. § 341—D(4); see 2 C.M.R. 06 096 002-12 § 24(B)(7).”
Champlain Wind, LLC v. Bd. of Env't Prot., 2015 ME 156 (Me. 2015). “See 38 M.R.S. § 341- *282 D(4) (2014). The Board considered the evidence in the record, heard a presentation by the Department, and heard :oral argument from the parties involved.”
Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Town of Oakland, 488 A.2d 151 (Me. 1985). “See 38 M.R.S.A. § 341 (Supp.1984). Under the Site Location Development Act, 38 M.”
FPL Energy Maine Hydro v. State of Maine, Bd. of Envtl. Prot. (Me. Super. Ct 2009). “This conclusion is bolstered by 38 M.R.S. § 341­ D(3), which allows the BEP to revisit and modify the terms of any license based upon a subsequent change in condition or circumstance.”
Tourangeau v. Maine Bd. of Env't Prot. (Me. Super. Ct 2015). “The Board's order addressed the appellants' request for a public hearing but noted that such a hearing is discretionary under 38 M.R.S. § 341- D(4) and concluded that the evidentiary record was sufficiently developed and that a public hearing was not warranted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.