Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 38, § 487 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1969, c. 571, §2 (NEW). PL 1971, c. 618, §12 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 423, §9 (RPR). PL 1977, c. 300, §34 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1970–2010 · leading case: Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Bd. of Env't Prot., 2010 ME 18 (Me. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Bd. of Env't Prot., 2010 ME 18 (Me. 2010). · cites it 2× “, 38 M.R.S.A. § 487 (Supp.1972) (providing appeals from a decision of the Environmental Improvement Commission under the Site Location of Development statute directly to this Court); see also 35-A M.”
Matter of Lappie, 377 A.2d 441 (Me. 1977). · cites it 3× “The appellant, Earl Babcock (an abutting landowner), appealed the Board’s decision to the Law Court pursuant to 38 M.R.S.A. § 487. *442 Babcock asserted that the Board’s findings with regard to Mrs.”
In Re Maine Clean Fuels, Inc., 310 A.2d 736 (Me. 1973). · cites it 3× “1 This is an appeal pursuant to 38 M.R.S.A. § 487 seeking judicial review of the EIC action.”
In Re the Pittston Co. Oil Refinery & Marine Terminal at Eastport, 375 A.2d 530 (Me. 1977). · cites it 6× “The public interest aspect of the article is evident in the judicial review section (38 M.R.S.A. § 487) which provides that " [a]ny person aggrieved by any order of the Board .”
State Ex Rel. Brennan v. RD Realty Corp., 349 A.2d 201 (Me. 1975). · cites it 3× “The judicial participation is usually initiated either by appeal from the Commis-ion’s Order under the provisions of 38 M.R.S.A. § 487 in which case appeal is to *206 the Supreme Judicial Court sitting as a Law Court 3 or by invoking 38 M.”
In Re Spring Valley Dev., 300 A.2d 736 (Me. 1973). · cites it 2× “From this decision of the Commission, Lakesites has appealed to the Supreme Judicial Court sitting as the Law Court, [38 M.R.S.A. § 487] raising specifically the issue as to whether the offering for sale of subdivided lots of the type owned by Lake-sites is either a commercial…”
In Re Belgrade Shores, Inc., 371 A.2d 413 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “38 M.R.S.A. § 487; In re Belgrade Shores, Inc.”
King Resources Co. v. Env't Improvement Comm'n, 270 A.2d 863 (Me. 1970). “We cannot surmise however that the Legislature meant the Superior Court in section 487 when it specifically provided that the appeal be to the Supreme Judicial Court.”
Haskell v. Plan. Bd. of Town of Yarmouth, 388 A.2d 100 (Me. 1978). “, sufficient to grant standing under 38 M.R.S.A. § 487. 2 . We have had previous occasion to discuss the requirement of a hearing under M.”
In Re Ryerson Hill Solid Waste Disposal Site, 379 A.2d 384 (Me. 1977). “Pursuant to the Site Location of Development Law, 38 M.R.S.A. § 487 (1973 Supp.), the Ryerson Hill Association (hereinafter “Ryerson”), an Intervenor organization of Ryerson Hill property owners, brought this direct appeal from the Order of the Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.