Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 102-A (2026)

Incarceration of employee

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 559, §B43 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 654, §2 (RPR). PL 1989, c. 654, §§11-13 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1994 · leading case: Cote v. Great N. Paper Co., 611 A.2d 58 (Me. 1992).
Cote v. Great N. Paper Co., 611 A.2d 58 (Me. 1992). · cites it 2× “§ 87(4); and criminal acts by an employee that result in incarceration, 39 M.R.S.A. § 102-A. The employee's failure of the re-employment drug screening test constitutes a refusal to accept employment.”
Gifford v. Nelson Freightways, 645 A.2d 11 (Me. 1994). “39 M.R.S.A. § 102-A (1989) (benefits under sections 54-B and 55-B suspended during period of incarceration).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.