Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 106-A (2026)

Notice by the commission

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 142, §2 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 541, §A283 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 479, §29 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 682, §8 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1986–1986 · leading case: Eaton v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 502 A.2d 1040 (Me. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Eaton v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 502 A.2d 1040 (Me. 1986). · cites it 2× “1 Had BIW filed a timely notice of injury, Eaton claims, the notification mechanism of 39 M.R.S.A. § 106-A (Pamph.1985) 2 would have been triggered, and he would have been informed about the two year statute of limitations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.