Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 181 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1980 · leading case: Towle v. Dep't of Transp., State High., 318 A.2d 71 (Me. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Towle v. Dep't of Transp., State High., 318 A.2d 71 (Me. 1974). · cites it 2× “The disease or physical condition was not one covered by 39 M.R.S.A. § 181 et seq., the occupational disease law.”
McKenzie v. C. F. Hathaway Co., 415 A.2d 252 (Me. 1980). “Section 183 defines “occupational disease” as only a disease which is due to causes and conditions which are characteristic of a particular trade, occupation, process or employment and which arises out of and in the course of employment. Section 185 covers aggravation of a…”
Davis v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 338 A.2d 146 (Me. 1975). “if he shall not have given his employer at the time of his contract of hire notice in writing that he claimed such right, and within 10 days thereafter have filed a copy thereof with the commission .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.