Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 61 (2026)

Injury or death due to willful intention or intoxication

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–1992 · leading case: Cousins v. Georgia-Pac. Corp., 599 A.2d 73 (Me. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cousins v. Georgia-Pac. Corp., 599 A.2d 73 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “The Legislature has specifically addressed the issue of willful misconduct that causes work-connected injury; See 39 M.R.S.A. § 61 (1989). That section provides that “No compensation or other benefits shall be allowed for the injury or death of an employee .”
Wing v. Cornwall Indus., 418 A.2d 177 (Me. 1980). “[to] himself”, thus to invoke 39 M.R.S.A. § 61 as the basis for denying compensation.”
Cote v. Great N. Paper Co., 611 A.2d 58 (Me. 1992). · cites it 2× “The company contends that Cote's situation is analogous to an employee's failure to participate in an independent medical examination or refusal of medical treatment (section 65); an employee's intentional injury to himself (section 61); an employee's refusal to comply with an…”
Blackwelder v. Hemingway Transp., Inc., 383 A.2d 1091 (Me. 1978). “39 M.R.S.A. § 61 (1964). Thus, the employer had the burden of proof on each of those questions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.