Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1062 (2026)

Financing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 337, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 59, §§7,8 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 45, §§3-7 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 17, §§11,12 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 369, §§1,3 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 622, §§17-20 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 696, §39 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 700, §1 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 541, §A30 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 663, §§12-14 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 316, §D1 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 453, §1 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 700, §2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 45 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 391, §§5-7 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 801, §§2,7 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2009 · leading case: Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 27 v. Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 983 A.2d 391 (Me. 2009).
Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 27 v. Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 983 A.2d 391 (Me. 2009). · cites it 3× “Although at the time the District was required by statute to enroll the six secretaries in the State Retirement System, see 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 1062(2)(A), 1091(5) (1964), the District instead withheld Social Security contributions and submitted them to the Social Security…”
State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, 538 A.2d 755 (Me. 1988). “There is nothing in this record to reflect that by its proposals the Union sought through collective bargaining to have the State contract to pay members’ contributions to the retirement fund, as authorized by 5 M.”
Sch. Admin. Dist. 27 v. Employees Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 108 (Me. 2009). · cites it 3× “Although at the time the District was required by statute to enroll the six secretaries in the State Retirement System, see 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 1062(2)(A), 1091(5) (1964), the District instead withheld Social Security contributions and submitted them to the Social Security…”
Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. 27 v. Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. (Me. Super. Ct 2009). “See 5 M.R.S.A. § 1062(2) (1971). Specifically, section 1062(2)(A) parallels section 17203(1)'s language in providing that [t]he board of trustees shall certify to the head of each department, and the head of each department shall cause to be deducted from the compensation of…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1062(2) — 1 case
Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. 27 v. Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys. (Me. Super. Ct 2009). “See 5 M.R.S.A. § 1062(2) (1971). Specifically, section 1062(2)(A) parallels section 17203(1)'s language in providing that [t]he board of trustees shall certify to the head of each department, and the head of each department shall cause to be deducted from the compensation of…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1062(2)(A) — 2 cases
Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 27 v. Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 983 A.2d 391 (Me. 2009). “Although at the time the District was required by statute to enroll the six secretaries in the State Retirement System, see 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 1062(2)(A), 1091(5) (1964), the District instead withheld Social Security contributions and submitted them to the Social Security…”
Sch. Admin. Dist. 27 v. Employees Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 108 (Me. 2009). “Although at the time the District was required by statute to enroll the six secretaries in the State Retirement System, see 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 1062(2)(A), 1091(5) (1964), the District instead withheld Social Security contributions and submitted them to the Social Security…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 1062(2)(G) — 1 case
State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, 538 A.2d 755 (Me. 1988). “There is nothing in this record to reflect that by its proposals the Union sought through collective bargaining to have the State contract to pay members’ contributions to the retirement fund, as authorized by 5 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.