Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 214 (2026)

Waiver; public policy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any waiver by a consumer of the provisions of this chapter is contrary to public policy and shall be unenforceable and void.   [PL 1973, c. 321 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 321 (NEW).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2020 · leading case: Baldwin v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. (D. Me. 2020).
Baldwin v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. (D. Me. 2020). “” 5 M.R.S.A. § 214 (West 2020). Thus, Baldwin’s motion to dismiss turns on whether the disclaimers contained in the Participation Agreement Baldwin signed constitute waivers that are prohibited by the MUTPA.”
Cherot v. Pemaquid Beach Boat Works (Me. Super. Ct 2005). “” 5 M.R.S.A. § 214. Thus, it is argued, because a provision “of this chapter” authorizes commencement of an action under the UTPA in the Superior Court or District Court, 5 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.