Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 9051 (2026)

Scope

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Adjudicatory proceeding. In any adjudicatory proceedings, except those proceedings involving correctional facilities, the Workers' Compensation Board, the Maine Motor Vehicle Franchise Board or the State Parole Board, the procedures of this subchapter apply.

[PL 2005, c. 61, §1 (AMD).]

2. Hearing. Unless a hearing is required by statute, the requirements of this subchapter, except the notice provisions of section 9052, subsection 1, shall not apply until a request for a hearing is made under section 9052, subsection 1, paragraph A, or a hearing is set by the agency.

[PL 1977, c. 551, §3 (NEW).]

3. Filing and service. The filing of any submission in any adjudicatory proceeding or the service of any paper on a party to an adjudicatory proceeding is complete:

A. Upon an agency when the agency receives the submission or the paper by mail, in-hand delivery or any other means specified by the agency; or [PL 1989, c. 297, §2 (NEW).]

B. Upon a party upon mailing of the paper to the party or the party's attorney, upon in-hand delivery to the recipient or by delivery to the recipient's office. [PL 1989, c. 297, §2 (NEW).]

[PL 1989, c. 297, §2 (NEW).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1977, c. 551, §3 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 616, §1 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 694, §§35-A (AMD). PL 1979, c. 127, §39 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 297, §2 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §D2 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 61, §1 (AMD).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Cotton v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 431 A.2d 637 (Me. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cotton v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 431 A.2d 637 (Me. 1981). “, expressly makes the provisions of the Maine Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.R.S.A. § 9051 et seq. applicable to proceedings before the Employment Security Commission.”

Livingstone v. A-R Cable Servs. of Maine, 2000 ME 18 (Me. 2000). · cites it 2× “Title 5 M.R.S.A. § 9051(1) delineates the scope of the adjudicatory proceedings subchapter, and provides that, "[i]n any adjudicatory proceedings, except those proceedings involving correctional facilities, the Workers' Compensation Board or the State Parol Board, the procedures…”

Sebasticook Valley Health Care Facility, Inc. v. State, 484 A.2d 595 (Me. 1984). “5 M.R.S.A. §§ 9051 et seq. The Hearing Officer upheld the disal-lowance.”

Coates v. Maine Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 428 A.2d 423 (Me. 1981). “As such, the Commission fee-setting proceeding is subject to all the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.R.S.A. § 9051 et seq., including the provisions requiring that the administrative litigant be given an opportunity to be heard, id.”

Hanover Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Bd., 1997 ME 104 (Me. 1997). “5 M.R.S.A. § 9051(1) (Supp.1996) (“In any adjudicatory proceedings, except those proceedings involving .”

Sparks v. Mills (D. Me. 2021). “See 5 M.R.S. §§ 9051 et seq. Plaintiff has the right to appeal to the Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission.”

Dechaine v. Dept. of Corr. (Me. Super. Ct 2005). “6 Insofar as the present case involves a correctional facility, 5 M.R.S.A. § 9051(1) indicates that the notice provisions cited by Dechaine are irrelevant.”

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 5, § 9051(1): 3 cases

Livingstone v. A-R Cable Servs. of Maine, 2000 ME 18 (Me. 2000). “Title 5 M.R.S.A. § 9051(1) delineates the scope of the adjudicatory proceedings subchapter, and provides that, "[i]n any adjudicatory proceedings, except those proceedings involving correctional facilities, the Workers' Compensation Board or the State Parol Board, the procedures…”

Hanover Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Bd., 1997 ME 104 (Me. 1997). “5 M.R.S.A. § 9051(1) (Supp.1996) (“In any adjudicatory proceedings, except those proceedings involving .”

Dechaine v. Dept. of Corr. (Me. Super. Ct 2005). “6 Insofar as the present case involves a correctional facility, 5 M.R.S.A. § 9051(1) indicates that the notice provisions cited by Dechaine are irrelevant.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.