Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 9, § 5014 (2026)

Violation as unfair trade practice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any violation of this chapter shall constitute a violation of Title 5, chapter 10, the Unfair Trade Practices Act.   [PL 1977, c. 488, §1 (NEW).]
Any intentional violation of this chapter shall be a Class D crime.   [PL 1977, c. 488, §1 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 488, §1 (NEW).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2010 · leading case: Christian Action Network v. Maine, 679 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D. Me. 2010).
Christian Action Network v. Maine, 679 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D. Me. 2010). “The unauthorized name restriction certainly would be constitutional if applied only to the deceptive use of names in solicitations (indeed, 9 M.R.S.A. § 5014 treats a violation of the Act as a violation of Maine’s Unfair Trade Practices Act).”
State v. Smith, 551 A.2d 449 (Me. 1988). “§ 353 (1983), violating the Charitable Solicitations Act, 9 M.R.S.A. § 5014 (1980 & Supp.1986), and witness tampering, 17-A M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.