Md. Code Ann. » Maryland Code / Criminal Procedure
Maryland Code

Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. § 7-101 (2026)

§ 7-101

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MD-GAmgaleg.maryland.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§7–101.

    This title applies to a person convicted in any court in the State who is:

        (1)    confined under sentence of imprisonment; or

        (2)    on parole or probation.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: Peterson v. State, 226 A.3d 246 (Md. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peterson v. State, 226 A.3d 246 (Md. 2020). “CRIMINAL LAW – POST-CONVICTION RELIEF – UNIFORM POST- CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT – The Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act (“UPPA”), codified at MD. CODE ANN., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 7-101 (“Crim.”
Kranz v. State, 187 A.3d 66 (Md. 2018). “), § 7-101 of the Criminal Procedure Article, ("Crim.”
Schlick v. State, 194 A.3d 49 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2018). “It would seem that in cases where post-conviction relief is requested after five years from the date the sentence originally was imposed on the defendant , the relief requested being authorization to file a belated motion for modification of sentence, and such relief…”
Parker v. State, 866 A.2d 885 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2005). “Code (2001), § 7-101 of the Criminal Procedure Article.”
State v. Thomas, 322 A.3d 32 (Md. 2024). “Key to the court’s decision was that Schlick had been granted leave to file a belated motion to modify as a remedy under the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, MD. CODE ANN., CRIM. PROC. §§ 7-101 to -301 (2001, 2018 Repl.”
State v. Clements, 192 A.3d 686 (Md. 2018). “27, § 645A(e) (1998) (current version at Md. Code Ann., Criminal Procedure Article §§ 7-101 to 7-109 ) ).”
Barnett v. Gang (D. Md. 2020). · cites it 2× “In Maryland, a criminal defendant may challenge his or her convictions through a petition under the state Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act (“UPPA”), Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. §§ 7-101 et seq.”
Schisler v. D.P.S.C.S. (D. Md. 2021). · cites it 2× “Under the Maryland Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act (“UPPA”), Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. §§ 7-101 to 7-109, a person “confined under sentence of imprisonment,” Md.”
Walker v. Bishop (D. Md. 2023). · cites it 2× “State Post-Conviction Proceedings On March 27, 2015, Walker filed a self-represented Petition for Post-Conviction Relief pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. §§ 7-101 to 7-204 (LexisNexis 2018).”
Baumgardner v. Armstead (D. Md. 2024). · cites it 2× “On January 12, 2015, Baumgardner filed with the Circuit Court a self-represented Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (“the State Petition”) pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. §§ 7-101 to 7-204 (LexisNexis 2018), which was…”
Nivens v. J. Phillip Morgan (D. Md. 2019). · cites it 2× “On October 10, 2012, Nivens filed a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Proc. §§ 7-101 to 7-301 (2018).”
Kranz v. State (Md. 2018). “”) provides: This title applies to a person convicted in any court in this State who is: (1) confined under sentence of imprisonment; or (2) on parole or probation. As the Court of Special Appeals explained, imbedded in § 7-101 is a “custody” requirement, which must first be…”
Show all 29 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.