Maryland Code

Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-139 (2026)

§ 5-139

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MD-GAmgaleg.maryland.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§5–139.

    (a)    A person may not knowingly give false information or make a material misstatement in a firearm application or in an application for a dealer’s license.

    (b)    A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or a fine not exceeding $5,000 or both.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2010–2012 · leading case: Hightower v. City of Boston, 693 F.3d 61 (1st Cir. 2012).
Hightower v. City of Boston, 693 F.3d 61 (1st Cir. 2012). “”); Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-139 (a) ("A person may not knowingly give false information or make a material misstatement in a firearm application.”
FURDA v. State, 997 A.2d 856 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2010). “), § 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article (“P.”
Furda v. State, 1 A.3d 528 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “), § 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article ("P.”
Furda v. State, 26 A.3d 918 (Md. 2011). “Code (2003), § 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article (“PS”).”
Ali v. State, 21 A.3d 140 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2011). “), section 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article (“PS”), Ali was charged with “knowingly giv[ing] false information or mak[ing] a material misstatement in a firearm application.”
Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-139(a): 4 cases
FURDA v. State, 997 A.2d 856 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2010). “), § 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article (“P.”
Furda v. State, 1 A.3d 528 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2010). “), § 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article ("P.”
Furda v. State, 26 A.3d 918 (Md. 2011). “Code (2003), § 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article (“PS”).”
Ali v. State, 21 A.3d 140 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2011). “), section 5-139(a) of the Public Safety Article (“PS”), Ali was charged with “knowingly giv[ing] false information or mak[ing] a material misstatement in a firearm application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.