Maryland Court Rules
Md. Interpreter Canon 2 (2026)
Md. Interpreter Canon 2. Canon 2. Representation of Qualifications
✓ current as of August 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MD-GAmgaleg.maryland.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Interpreters shall accurately and completely represent their certifications, training, and pertinent experience.
Commentary
Acceptance of a case by an interpreter conveys linguistic and interpreting competency in legal settings. Withdrawing or being asked to withdraw from a case after it begins causes a disruption of court proceedings and is wasteful of scarce public resources. It is therefore essential that, prior to appointment, interpreters present a complete and truthful account of their training, certification, and experience, so the officers of the court can fairly evaluate their qualifications for delivering interpreting services.
Credits
[Adopted Oct. 31, 2002, eff. Jan. 1, 2003.]