Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209C, § 13 (2026)

Inspection of documents; copies; segregation of records

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 13. In an action to establish parentage or in which parentage of a child is an issue, all complaints, pleadings, papers, documents or reports filed in connection therewith, docket entries in the permanent docket and record books shall be segregated and unavailable for inspection only if the judge of the court where such records are kept, for good cause shown, so orders or the person alleged to be the parent is adjudicated not to be the parent of the child; provided, however, that the child, the person who gave birth to the child, the person adjudicated to be the parent and the department of transitional assistance, the department of children and families, the division of medical assistance or any other public assistance program and the IV–D agency as set forth in chapter 119A, when the child who is or was the subject of the complaint is a recipient of public assistance or the attorney for any of them, and the department of children and families, when the child who is or was the subject of the complaint is within the care and protection of the department of children and families, is the subject of a petition for such care or protection pursuant to chapter 119 or is the subject of a petition to dispense with consent for adoption pursuant to subsection (b) of section 3 of chapter 210, shall have access to and the right to obtain copies of the papers, docket books and judgments in actions pursuant to this chapter. For good cause shown, which may be made ex parte or upon credible evidence, parties may file a complaint without the address, and the court shall impound a party's address by excluding it from the complaint and from all other court documents and testimony, and shall ensure that the address is kept confidential from each other party except the IV–D agency as set forth in chapter 119A.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2007 · leading case: Johnson v. Bd. of Bar Overseers of Mass., 324 F. Supp. 2d 276 (D. Mass. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Bd. of Bar Overseers of Mass., 324 F. Supp. 2d 276 (D. Mass. 2004). “Count I of the Petition alleges that Johnson posted impounded “privileged, confidential and highly personal information” to her website in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209C, § 13. Pet. ¶¶ 23-24.”
Peckham v. Boston Herald, Inc., 719 N.E.2d 888 (Mass. App. Ct. 1999). “151, § 467, made docket *290 entries and other court papers connected with paternity proceedings unavailable for public inspection unless ordered by a judge for good cause shown.”
In re Johnson, 877 N.E.2d 249 (Mass. 2007). “nded material on her Web site for the following reasons: (1) the Juvenile Court orders were invalid because she never obtained material from the care and protection proceeding and thus never posted impounded material from that case; (2) the Probate and Family Court order was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.