Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 212, § 30 (2026)

Labor dispute cases; panel of justices; hearing; review

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 30. In any action or proceeding involving or arising under section twenty B, twenty C or twenty-four of chapter one hundred and forty-nine, or section six or six A of chapter two hundred and fourteen, the chief justice shall designate three associate justices to hear and determine the action or proceeding. The decision of said court shall be subject to review in accordance with the provision of subsection (6) of section six of chapter two hundred and fourteen.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 19 cases, 1962–2011 · leading case: Colucci v. Rosen, Goldberg, Slavet, Levenson, 515 N.E.2d 891 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Colucci v. Rosen, Goldberg, Slavet, Levenson, 515 N.E.2d 891 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987). · cites it 10× “After argument, the application was denied by the judge and on the ground that a temporary restraining order could be granted only by a three-judge panel convened under G.L.c. 212, § 30. This statute requires the Chief Justice of the Superior Court to designate three judges of…”

Colucci v. Rosen, Goldberg, Slavet, Levenson & Wekstein, P.C., 25 Mass. App. Ct. 107 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987). · cites it 10× “that a temporary restraining order could be granted only by a three-judge panel convened under G. L. c. 212, § 30. This statute requires the Chief Justice of the Superior Court to designate three judges of that court to hear and determine proceedings involving or arising under G.”

Jones v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., 308 N.E.2d 512 (Mass. 1974). · cites it 12× “G.L.c. 212, § 30. In our opinion the present cases fall within the statutory definitions attracting all the procedural restrictions described above, and the order of annulment was therefore correct.”

Massachusetts Corr. Officers Federated Union v. Cnty. of Bristol, 833 N.E.2d 1182 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “Thus, we conclude that the Anti-Injunction Act (§ 6) does not apply and that the court’s jurisdiction to enter the relief requested by the union did not depend on strict compliance with the specified procedures, including sworn testimony before, and findings under § 6(1) by, a…”

Opinion of the Justices to the Senate, 363 N.E.2d 652 (Mass. 1977). “781 (1959) (upholding the constitutionality of a proposed statute [G. L. c. 212, § 30] that *895 would require the chief justice of the Superior Court to appoint three associate justices of that court to hear and determine certain proceedings involving labor disputes).”

Labor Relations Comm'n v. Univ. Hosp., Inc., 269 N.E.2d 682 (Mass. 1971). “G. L. c. 212, § 30, inserted by St. 1959, c.”

Brockton Pub. Markets, Inc. v. Jones, 308 N.E.2d 532 (Mass. 1974). · cites it 8× “In each of the two cases a judge of the Superior Court, acting alone and not as part of a three-judge court (G.L.c. 212, § 30), without hearing testimony and without making any findings of fact (G.”

Hansen v. Commonwealth, 181 N.E.2d 843 (Mass. 1962). “G. L. c. 212, § 30 (inserted by St. 1959, c.”

McCormack v. Labor Relations Comm'n, 266 N.E.2d 651 (Mass. 1971). · cites it 2× “This is an appeal by the intervener from a final decree of a three-judge Superior Court panel (see G. L. c. 212, § 30, inserted by St. 1959, c.”

Labor Relations Comm'n v. Blue Hill Spring Water Co., 11 Mass. App. Ct. 50 (Mass. App. Ct. 1980). “These are appeals from a judgment by a three-judge panel of the Superior Court (G. L. c. 212, § 30) dismissing an action brought under G.”

Allen v. Sch. Comm. of Boston, 487 N.E.2d 529 (Mass. 1986). “” 2 The three-judge panel also concluded that, as a panel convened pursuant to G. L. c. 212, § 30 (1984 ed.), it had authority to grant injunctive relief to achieve the goal of the underlying action — requiring the school committee to provide appropriate transportation services.”

Thibeault v. Chief of Police, 363 N.E.2d 280 (Mass. App. Ct. 1977). “” a three-judge court was required pursuant to G. L. c. 212, § 30, and G. L. c. 149, § 20C (but see Hansen v.”

Show all 19 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.