Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 233, § 6 (2026)

Warrant for nonattending witness

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 6. The court, justice, master in chancery, master, auditor or county commissioners may in such case issue a warrant to bring such witness before them to answer for the contempt, and also to testify in the case in which he was summoned.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1973–2000 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Brookins, 603 N.E.2d 916 (Mass. App. Ct. 1992).
Commonwealth v. Brookins, 603 N.E.2d 916 (Mass. App. Ct. 1992). “The existence of a statutory authorization (G. L. c. 233, § 6) and a procedural rule (Mass.”
McMahon v. McMahon, 305 N.E.2d 521 (Mass. App. Ct. 1973). “G. L. c. 233, § 6. Barrus v. Phaneuf, 166 Mass.”
King v. Barber, 2000 Mass. App. Div. 270 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 2000). “See G.L.c. 233, §6. A transcript of the June 18,1999 hearing of Barber’s motion for a continuance reflects that plaintiffs counsel did not oppose a continuance.”
Tobin v. First Count, Inc., 1981 Mass. App. Div. 129 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div. 1981). · cites it 2× “The implementation of this principle is aided by G.L.c.233, §6 which provides that a court “may’ ’ issue a warrant to compel the trial attendance and testimony of a witness who has failed to respond duly to a proper subpoena or summons.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.