Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 252, § 2 (2026)

State reclamation and mosquito control board

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 2. One employee of the department of environmental protection designated by its commissioner, one employee of the department of food and agriculture designated by its commissioner, and one employee of the department of environmental management designated by its commissioner, shall constitute the state reclamation and mosquito control board, in this chapter called the board. The designation of any member of said board may be revoked at any time, and in such case or in case of the resignation or disability of any member his successor shall be designated in the same manner as in the original designation. The board shall serve in the department of food and agriculture, and the members thereof shall receive no additional compensation for service on said board, but shall be entitled to their reasonable traveling and other expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2013 · leading case: Commissioners of the Bristol Cnty. Mosquito Control Dist. v. State Reclamation & Mosquito Control Bd., 466 Mass. 523 (Mass. 2013).
Commissioners of the Bristol Cnty. Mosquito Control Dist. v. State Reclamation & Mosquito Control Bd., 466 Mass. 523 (Mass. 2013). · cites it 2× “The board is established by G. L. c. 252, § 2, and, pursuant to that section, exists within the State agency formerly known, and referred to in § 2, as the Department of Food and Agriculture.”
De Grandis v. Silva, 17 Mass. L. Rptr. 364 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration pursuant to G.L.c. 252, §2. 3 For the reasons discussed below, the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is ALLOWED.”
Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 252, § 2(a): 1 case
De Grandis v. Silva, 17 Mass. L. Rptr. 364 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2004). “This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration pursuant to G.L.c. 252, §2. 3 For the reasons discussed below, the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is ALLOWED.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.