Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 168 (2026)

Criminal record review board

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 168. (a) There shall be a criminal record review board within the department of criminal justice information services consisting of the following persons: the secretary of public safety and security, who shall serve as chair, the attorney general, the secretary of labor and workforce development, the chair of the Massachusetts sentencing commission, the chief counsel for the committee for public counsel services, the chair of the parole board, the commissioner of correction, the commissioner of probation, the commissioner of youth services, the colonel of state police and the presidents of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association, the Massachusetts Sheriffs' Association and the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, or their designees, all of whom shall serve ex officio, and 5 persons to be appointed by the governor, 1 of whom shall represent private users of criminal offender record information, 1 of whom shall be a victim of crime, 1 of whom shall have experience in the areas of workforce development or ex-offender rehabilitation and 2 of whom shall be persons who have experience in issues relating to personal privacy. Upon the expiration of the term of any appointive member, his successor shall be appointed in a like manner for a term of 3 years.

The chair shall hold regular meetings, 1 of which shall be an annual meeting, and shall notify all board members of the time and place of all meetings. Special meetings may be called at any time by a majority of the board members and shall be called by the chair upon written application of 9 or more members. Members of the board shall serve without compensation but shall be reimbursed for their expenses actually and necessarily incurred in the discharge of their official duties.

(b) The board may hear complaints and investigate any incidents alleging that a person that has requested or received criminal offender record information has failed to provide the subject with the criminal offender record information in his possession prior to questioning the subject about his criminal history in connection with a decision regarding employment, volunteer opportunities, housing or professional licensing or in connection with an adverse decision on such an application on the basis of the criminal offender record information. The board may hear complaints and investigate any incidents alleging any other violation of sections 168 to 178A, inclusive, or violation of board rules and regulations. The board may charge and collect a fee, established by the secretary, as a condition for filing a complaint, which fee may be waived upon a finding of indigency. Any complaint filed with the board shall be supported by a written declaration by the complainant that it is made under the penalties of perjury. An answer filed by a responding party shall be signed under the penalties of perjury by an individual with personal knowledge of its contents. In conducting investigations and hearings, the board, or department staff designated by the board, shall have the power to summons witnesses, compel their attendance and testimony, require the production of books, records and documents, administer oaths and have access to all criminal offender record information. The chair of the board may appoint a member, panel of 3 board members or a hearing officer to conduct hearings, according to the standard rules of adjudicatory procedure or other rules which the department may adopt, in consultation with the board. Following review of a complaint by a member, panel or hearing officer, the board, by a vote of two-thirds of the members present and voting, shall issue a ruling as to the findings of the board. In accordance with its findings, the board may issue orders and sanctions enforcing this section and the board's rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, a remand for additional fact finding, the imposition of civil fines payable to the commonwealth not to exceed $5,000 for each knowing violation and conditions on continued access to criminal offender record information or revocation of access; provided, however, that the board shall not issue any orders, sanctions or fines against a law enforcement officer who, in good faith, obtains or seeks to obtain, or communicates or seeks to communicate criminal offender record information in the furtherance of the officer's official duties. The board may at any time refer a complaint for criminal prosecution under section 178 of this chapter.

The board shall make an annual report of the volume and disposition of complaints without identifying data on any complainant or other information that would include criminal offender record information relative to any person reviewed by the board to the governor and file a copy thereof with the state secretary, the attorney general, the clerk of the house of representatives and the clerk of the senate. The annual report shall also be available to the public upon request.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1978–2014 · leading case: McCambridge v. Hall, 303 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McCambridge v. Hall, 303 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2002). “See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, § 168 (2000). The Board is comprised of several law enforcement officials and associations.”
New Bedford Stand.-Times Publ'g Co. v. Clerk of the Third Dist. Court, 387 N.E.2d 110 (Mass. 1979). · cites it 2× “See G.L.c. 6, §§ 168, 170. The Supreme Court has taken note of "the threat to privacy implicit in the accumulation of vast amounts of personal information in computerized data banks or other massive government files," including information required for "the enforcement of the…”
Police Comm'r v. Mun. Court of Dorchester Dist., 374 N.E.2d 272 (Mass. 1978). “As we have already noted, notes 3 to 5, supra, a Criminal History Systems Board was created by G. L. c. 6, § 168, to administer and regulate “criminal offender record information [GOBI].”
Commonwealth v. Pon, 14 N.E.3d 182 (Mass. 2014). “See G. L. c. 6, §§ 168, 175; St. 2010, c. 256, §§ 12, 21, 35.”
Bellin v. Kelley, 755 N.E.2d 1274 (Mass. 2001). · cites it 2× “For access under clause (c), the criminal history systems board (established by G. L. c. 6, § 168) (board) must first determine and certify by a two-thirds majority “that the public interest in disseminating such information to such party clearly outweighs the interest in…”
Rzeznik v. Chief of Police of Southampton, 373 N.E.2d 1128 (Mass. 1978). “6 Although the plaintiff argues that the regulations promulgated under G. L. c. 6, § 168, precluded the defendant from using the sealed records as he did, our reading of the regulations leads us to conclude that they do not support the plaintiff’s argument.”
Bynes v. Sch. Comm. of Boston, 581 N.E.2d 1019 (Mass. 1991). “The board, consistent with its responsibility under G. L. c. 6, §§ 168, 171, reviews criminal records before releasing them to determine that only relevant information is released.”
Schuurman v. Town of North Reading, 139 F.R.D. 276 (D. Mass. 1991). “The Criminal History Systems Board is- an appointed body created by Mass.Gen.L. ch. 6, § 168 to administer the Criminal Offender Record System.”
Kordis v. Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Corr. Ctr., 787 N.E.2d 613 (Mass. App. Ct. 2003). “As part of a program to regulate the “collection, storage, access, dissemination, content, organization, and use of criminal offender record information,” CORI systems and procedures were created to resolve questions of individual privacy and system security in connection with…”
Est. of Strong v. Am. Drug Stores, Inc., 14 Mass. L. Rptr. 353 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2002). “See G.L.c. 6, §168. CHSB is organized to respond to thousands of requests each year from individuals and organizations seeking access to CORI.”
Commonwealth v. Mumford, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 462 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2008). “” G.L.c. 6, §168. The Board also controls “the installation, operation and maintenance of data processing and data communication systems, .”
Anderson v. 124 Green Street, LLC, 28 Mass. L. Rptr. 119 (Mass. Super. Ct. 2011). “Because the facts in this case concern charges that are no longer pending, the Court uses initials to protect non-public criminal offender information in the event that this decision is disseminated beyond the parties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.