Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 106 / Act 215 of 1895
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 106.3 (2026)

Constructing, purchasing, or extending waterworks; borrowing; expenditure.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE FOURTH CLASS CITY ACT


Act 215 of 1895


106.3 Constructing, purchasing, or extending waterworks; borrowing; expenditure.

Sec. 3.

    It shall be lawful for a city, subject to the provisions of this act, to borrow money to be used exclusively for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, or extending waterworks, as provided in sections 1 and 2 of this chapter. The total amount expended for constructing, purchasing, or extending such waterworks shall not exceed the estimate of expense provided for in section 4 of this chapter.

History: 1895, Act 215, Eff. Aug. 30, 1895 ;-- CL 1897, 3249 ;-- CL 1915, 3167 ;-- CL 1929, 2091 ;-- CL 1948, 106.3 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 88, Eff. Mar. 20, 1970 ;-- Am. 1974, Act 345, Imd. Eff. Dec. 21, 1974

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Regents of the Univ. of Michigan, 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Regents of the Univ. of Michigan, 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008). · cites it 2× “A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 106.3(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 106.”
Attar 2018, LLC v. Taylor, City of (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 4× “Upon failure of the owner or agent having charge of a property to cut and destroy weeds after service of a notice of violation, they shall be subject to prosecution in accordance with Section 106.3[2] and as prescribed by the authority having jurisdiction.”
Coalition to Def. Aff. Act. v. REGENTS OF U OF MI., 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008). · cites it 2× “A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 106.3(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 106.”
Boniecki v. Warren, City of (E.D. Mich. 2023). · cites it 2× “Include a statement of the right to file a lien in accordance with Section 106.3. IMPC § 107; see also Ordinances § 28-2(k).”
People of the City of Southfield v. Ieshula R Ishakis (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “” IPMC, § 106.3. If the individual does not comply with the notice of violation, the code official “shall institute the appropriate proceeding at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such violation .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 106.3(a) — 2 cases
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Regents of the Univ. of Michigan, 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 106.3(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 106.”
Coalition to Def. Aff. Act. v. REGENTS OF U OF MI., 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 106.3(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 106.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 106.3(b) — 2 cases
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Regents of the Univ. of Michigan, 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 106.3(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 106.”
Coalition to Def. Aff. Act. v. REGENTS OF U OF MI., 539 F. Supp. 2d 924 (E.D. Mich. 2008). “A recipient may be required to undertake additional recruitment efforts for one sex as remedial action pursuant to § 106.3(a), and may choose to undertake such efforts as affirmative action pursuant to § 106.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.