Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 123 / Act 191 of 1968
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 123.1011a (2026)

Jurisdiction over annexation petitions or resolutions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STATE BOUNDARY COMMISSION


Act 191 of 1968


123.1011a Jurisdiction over annexation petitions or resolutions.

Sec. 11a.

    The commission shall have jurisdiction over petitions or resolutions for annexation as provided in section 9 of Act No. 279 of the Public Acts of 1909, as amended.

History: Add. 1972, Act 362, Imd. Eff. Jan. 9, 1973

Compiler's Notes:

    For provisions of section 9 of Act 279 of 1909, referred to in this section, see MCL 117.9.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: Midland Twp. v. State Boundary Comm'n, 259 N.W.2d 326 (Mich. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Midland Twp. v. State Boundary Comm'n, 259 N.W.2d 326 (Mich. 1977). · cites it 2× “" MCLA 123.1011a; MSA 5.2242(11a). Our disposition makes it unnecessary to consider the townships' contentions that these amendments do not cure the constitutional infirmity of the 1970 amendment as it relates to the 1968 act and the home rule cities act, and that such…”
Casco Twp. v. State Boundary Comm'n, 622 N.W.2d 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “4087(29) states that where an Act 425 agreement “is in effect, another method of annexation or transfer shall not take place for any portion of an area transferred under the contract.”
Teridee LLC v. Charter Twp. of Haring (Mich. 2017). · cites it 2× “MCL 123.1011a grants the Commission jurisdiction over petitions or resolutions for annexation as provided in MCL 117.”
Twp. of Hopkins v. State Boundary Comm'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Two years later, the Legislature amended the SBCA by adding MCL 123.1011a, expressly establishing the Commission’s jurisdiction over annexation petitions and resolutions.”
Williams Twp. v. City of Midland, 289 N.W.2d 892 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “MCL 123.1011a; MSA 5.2242(lla). Section 9 directs, in its second sentence, that, "The district to be affected by every such proposed incorporation, consolidation or change of bounda *243 ries shall be deemed to include the whole of each city, village or township from which…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.