Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 124 / Act 425 of 1984
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 124.22 (2026)

Conditional transfer of property; period; written contract; renewal.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONDITIONAL TRANSFER OF PROPERTY BY CONTRACT


Act 425 of 1984


124.22 Conditional transfer of property; period; written contract; renewal.

Sec. 2.

    (1) Two or more local units may conditionally transfer property for a period of not more than 50 years for the purpose of an economic development project. A conditional transfer of property shall be controlled by a written contract agreed to by the affected local units.

    (2) A contract under this act may be renewed for additional periods of not to exceed 50 years upon approval of each legislative body of the affected local units.

History: 1984, Act 425, Eff. Mar. 29, 1985

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2001–2020 · leading case: Casco Twp. v. State Boundary Comm'n, 622 N.W.2d 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Casco Twp. v. State Boundary Comm'n, 622 N.W.2d 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “” See MCL 124.22(1); MSA 5.4087(22)(1). MCL 124.”
Vern Guindon v. Twp. of Dundee, Michigan, 488 F. App'x 27 (6th Cir. 2012). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 124.22 (1). On January 9, 2008, the Township decided at its public meeting to put the negotiations on hold, pending resolution of a lawsuit Guindon had filed.”
Harbor Tel. 2103, LLC v. Oakland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 654 N.W.2d 633 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “” MCL 124.22(1). 3 According to the parties, the Harbor Companies filed a separate Oakland Circuit Court action challenging the Act 425 agreement.”
William Sherman v. City of St Joseph (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “See MCL 124.22(1); MCL 124.21(a). In 2005, the cities of St.”
Teridee LLC v. Charter Twp. of Haring (Mich. 2017). · cites it 2× “” MCL 124.22. 3 MCL 124.29 (“While a contract under this act is in effect, another method of annexation or transfer shall not take place for any portion of an area transferred under the contract.”
Charter Twp. of Haring v. City of Cadillac (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, Cadillac and Haring Township signed an agreement on May 5, 2003 pursuant to MCL 124.22,4 which conditionally transferred jurisdiction over the property from the township to the city, so that the city could provide the above mentioned services to the land in question.”
Mich. Comp. Laws § 124.22(1): 5 cases
Casco Twp. v. State Boundary Comm'n, 622 N.W.2d 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “” See MCL 124.22(1); MSA 5.4087(22)(1). MCL 124.”
Harbor Tel. 2103, LLC v. Oakland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 654 N.W.2d 633 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “” MCL 124.22(1). 3 According to the parties, the Harbor Companies filed a separate Oakland Circuit Court action challenging the Act 425 agreement.”
William Sherman v. City of St Joseph (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “See MCL 124.22(1); MCL 124.21(a). In 2005, the cities of St.”
Teridee LLC v. Charter Twp. of Haring (Mich. 2017). “” MCL 124.22. 3 MCL 124.29 (“While a contract under this act is in effect, another method of annexation or transfer shall not take place for any portion of an area transferred under the contract.”
Charter Twp. of Haring v. City of Cadillac (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “Accordingly, Cadillac and Haring Township signed an agreement on May 5, 2003 pursuant to MCL 124.22,4 which conditionally transferred jurisdiction over the property from the township to the city, so that the city could provide the above mentioned services to the land in question.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.