Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 124 / Act 35 of 1951
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 124.6 (2026)

Status of group insurance pool, programs, and coverages.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONTRACTS BETWEEN MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS


Act 35 of 1951


124.6 Status of group insurance pool, programs, and coverages.

Sec. 6.

    Any group self-insurance pool organized pursuant to section 5 is not an insurance company or insurer under the laws of this state. The development, administration, and provision of group self-insurance programs and coverages authorized by this act by the governing authority created to administer the pool pursuant to section 7(c) does not constitute doing an insurance business.

History: Add. 1982, Act 138, Imd. Eff. Apr. 27, 1982

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1875–2021 · leading case: Conrad v. Smith, 32 Mich. 429 (Mich. 1875).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Conrad v. Smith, 32 Mich. 429 (Mich. 1875). · cites it 2× “And section 124.6, which the defendants cite as that under which they assumed to act, directs the course to be pursued where the commissioners decide to use any portion over ten dollars of the moneys accruing to the township on account of non-resident highway taxes, in the…”
Cnty. Of Ingham V Mi Cnty. Road Comm'n Self-Ins. Pool (Mich. 2021). · cites it 2× “” But under MCL 124.6 of the intergovernmental contracts act, the Pool was not an insurance company or insurer, and its provision and administration of group self-insurance did not constitute “doing an insurance business” under the statute.”
Cnty. of Ingham v. Mi Cnty. Road Comm'n Self-Ins. Pool (Mich. 2021). · cites it 2× “” But under MCL 124.6 of the intergovernmental contracts act, the Pool was not an insurance company or insurer, and its provision and administration of group self-insurance did not constitute “doing an insurance business” under the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.